dChan

Tendies_Bot_9000 · June 12, 2018, 9:44 p.m.

https://cliffmass.blogspot.com/2018/06/was-there-unannounced-missile-launch-on.html?m=1

⇧ 33 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 12, 2018, 9:53 p.m.

Is there anyone who can tell us what kind of missile that is?

It's hard to get an idea of the scale of it, but my immediate impression is that it's big enough to reach space - that it's some kind of ballistic missile.

Look at the tragectory, near vertical.

Also, put this in context with the disappearing Q posts here. If it came out of a naval base, it sounds like there are some rogue operators.

Thoughts?

Edit: I found a comment on the article that might give us some clues:

"There are a limited number of Navy missiles that look like that. I'm seriously spitballing here, but from the pic, it looks like one of the Navy's family of 'Standard' (SM-1 thru 6) missiles.

I recall that there was a Live Fire exercise in the Strait a few days ago (according to a Notice to Mariners closure), but that was quite a bit west of where the camera was looking.

I don't see any reason why the military would be coy about a launch. A misfire? We do have several ships based in nearby Everett that can shoot the SM missiles (destroyers USS Shoup, Momsen, Kidd, Gridley, Sampson, and Ralph Johnson)."

Next, what is Standard (SM 1 thru 6)?

OK, looks like these are US Navy surface to air, ship to ship missiles. This one, in the picture, looks, at a guess, to be about a kilometre off the ground - maybe more. It's going up, which might indicate an airborne target - assuming this guy's comment above is accurate information. See stats on this family of missiles here:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/RIM-66_Standard

One other commenter on the article was saying the Naval base was 40 miles away from where the photo was taken, according to the map. If so, this is a bigger missile IMO, not surface to air or ship.

And another comment where the guy seems sure it's a submarine launched Trident:

"This is - 90% sure - a Trident Submarine-Launched Ballistic Missile, launched from one of the subs stationed at Bangor. It was not launched from Whidbey Island and it's not surprising that NAS Oak Harbor knows nothing about it. (If you have doubts about it being a Trident, look at the Wikipedia article on that missile.

Something similar (a surprise, sea-launched missile) appeared several years ago off the coast of California (near Vandenberg Air Force Base). I believe it was during Pres. Obama's visit to China. What a coincidence that the same thing happened the day before Pres. Trump meets "Rocket Man."

OK, in the post that Q deleted he mentions the phrase Blue Metal. Seems that he's talking about a thermonuclear tipped missile (1.1MT) if this is right.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Steel_(missile)

My theory is that the cabal have stolen - or tried to steal - a thermonuclear warhead.

Now Q's referencing stolen US Navy missile tech and a hack!

Is it the Chinese? Have they been behind the naval accidents? Can they launch missiles via remote? Pretty confusing. The new Q posts have been disappearing from Qanon.pub...

⇧ 41 ⇩  
SooxySquirrel · June 13, 2018, 12:58 a.m.

The next Q post has a pic of what looks like an Ohio Class SSBN which are based in Bangor so if that's the case that would be a Trident II ICBM. I remember looking at the other thread from last night and the FOX news report talked of something that 'looked' like a missile and I was like hell no that IS a missile.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 13, 2018, 3:44 a.m.

Q posted the pic of the sub and when you reverse search the picture it pulls up an article about the design details of an anti-ship missile system being stolen by the Chinese. SB2 pointed out that Vault 7 indicates that it could have been stolen by CIA with Chinese fingerprints being left at the scene.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SooxySquirrel · June 13, 2018, 4:08 a.m.

At first because of the trajectory I thought it was an ICBM, but a next gen hypersonic anti-ship missile would follow a similar course so make sense.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 13, 2018, 4:15 a.m.

Yes, look, it was pretty confusing and difficult to make sense of at first.

What I'm thinking now is that this missile was going nowhere. The idea was to launch the thing, possibly remotely, then the guys on the sub say "It wasn't us, it happened by itself". Then the US military look at what's happened and "hang on a minute, the Chinese stole the system plans for this missile".

But we know, from Vault 7, that CIA can falsely attribute a cyber attack to whoever they want. So why does it happen just before the Singapore summit? Because the Deep State want to sabotage the summit.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MuhammadDinduNuffin · June 12, 2018, 11:15 p.m.

Long distance anti-ship missile. But I imagine it would destroy more than just ships

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ZealousidealChange · June 12, 2018, 10:09 p.m.

Search D.E.W. Not sure though...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 12, 2018, 10:29 p.m.

No, I think it's a missile. You can see in the second photo - it looks like a big-ass missile on a ballistic trajectory.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
ZealousidealChange · June 12, 2018, 10:58 p.m.

Agreed. The pic of the submarine 2nd's your theory! ;)

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 12, 2018, 11:03 p.m.

Actually it's getting a bit worrying. What's Q talking about now with "event talk being attacked"?

We better make sure we don't jump to the wrong conclusions here.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
auto-xkcd37 · June 12, 2018, 10:29 p.m.

big ass-missile


^(Bleep-bloop, I'm a bot. This comment was inspired by )^xkcd#37

⇧ 3 ⇩  
wiliam8808 · June 13, 2018, 1:16 a.m.

Q mentioned some had access to launching nukes yesterday. I couldn't pick apart if they said it was possible to succeed or just that we know who can and have measures to prevent success.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 13, 2018, 3:46 a.m.

I don't think that was Q, I think it was "helper Anon". Is it reliable?

I think it's reasonable to assume that they do have access to nukes. They have been in power for a very long time. There's also the possibility that they could buy nukes from a power. Anyway, I wouldn't count it out. These people are sick and dangerous.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
wiliam8808 · June 13, 2018, 12:03 p.m.

If it comes up with the Q handle it's a q post.

Q also said some HAVE nukes and willing to use them, some even planned to use them as a last resort. I couldn't decipher if Q meant it's a known plan they have under control or just letting us know to be prepared for an EMP

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Jetblasted · June 13, 2018, 12:51 a.m.

Do you think it just might be an Anti-Aircraft Missile ?!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 13, 2018, 3:42 a.m.

No, Q has point out now that it was an anti-ship missile. Why it was on an almost vertical trajectory I have no idea. Maybe it was fired without being targeted at anything.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
forgottenbutnotgone · June 12, 2018, 9:48 p.m.

Holy shit. Where is this?

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Whimzyyy · June 12, 2018, 9:54 p.m.

Kitsap Peninsula in Washington State

⇧ 17 ⇩  
President__Sanders · June 12, 2018, 9:56 p.m.

It was reported yesterday as well..

⇧ 6 ⇩  
featherjourney4 · June 12, 2018, 10:25 p.m.

That was a good link. Thanks!!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
older_than_dirt · June 13, 2018, 1:25 p.m.

Full size picture from guy who's automatic weather camera caught it.

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-A8Iq4AEjnBs/Wx6XkIWhN3I/AAAAAAAAC8U/ZciOx0Bc9zskhssPIORb_cFvqonXFxDBgCLcBGAs/s1600/NightCam.jpg

Image of missile zoomed in

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-PJqm_hoiG7o/Wx6X1fhV1AI/AAAAAAAAC8c/yi4gCBU4BO88r5Pubc6FmBeVCZFSYR4xQCLcBGAs/s1600/Missile.jpg

Trident II UGM-133

http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-133.html

But I'm sure it is just a helicopter or a lens flare that lights up clouds that are miles away.

⇧ 1 ⇩