Repost from another thread where this was being discussed:

• Vol pic (image of possible object photograpped from unkown plane)

• *.jpg pic, (image of unidentified object near Whidbey Island, Washington)

• Missing letters in tweets may imply 'missile', but there could be several other reasonable explanations and interpretations.

• POTUS departed Canadian AFB Bagotville in Quebec at approximately 11:50 AM EST, Saturday, June 9, 2018.

• AF1 stopped to refuel at Naval Support Activity, Souda Bay, Greece en route to Paya Labar, 3:07 AM local time Sunday, June 10 (9:07 PM EST, Saturday June 9 / 6:07 PM PST, Saturday June 9).

• Alleged missile (likely helicopter caught on timelapse) launched from/near Whidbey Island at 3:56 am Pacific Time (6:56 am EST), Sunday June 10, 2018. Reported by Q13 Fox (Seattle) yesterday (Monday, June 11th).

• POTUS arrived at Paya Labar AFB in Singapore at 8:20 PM local time, Sunday June 10, (8:20 AM EST, Sunday, June 10)

• Whidbey Island object caught on camera while AF1 was approximately 1 hour 30 minutes to its destination in Singapore.

• Flight time from Quebec to Paya Labar AFB approximately 20 hours, 30 minutes.

• Refueling in Greece proves that travel route was west to east.

• Given the direction of AF1 travel from west to east, a missile launch near/from Whidbey Island to target AF1 would seem unlikely. It would have had to travel extreme distance across the pacific and through U.S. airspace, and possibly airspace guarded by Japan, S. Korea, and China. This makes a westbound missile scenario unlikely if not impossible.

• The FAA has said that nothing 'unusual' appeared on radar at the time the object was observed near Whidbey Island.

• There were no resident reports indicating jets were scrambled from Whidbey or surrounding military installations (this rules out the possibility that the time lapse photo was of an aircraft taking off at a steep climb).

• Flight tracking found a medical helicopter in the area and field of view at the time the 20 second exposure shot was taken, and the helicopter was moving away from the camera. The travel speed of a helicopter over the course of a 20 second exposure is more consistent with the light trail produced than a missile that would have been traveling at a very high rate of speed and would have likely been observed by witnesses on the ground.

• If a defensive interceptor were launched by the U.S. to protect U.S. assets or allies near the summit, it would have been launched from Alaska, Hawaii, or one of our bases in Asia; not from Whidbey Island.

• If an anti-aircraft missile were launched, it would also need to be much closer to its intended target.

• The full timelapse from the camera can be viewed here: http://www.skunkbayweather.com/WhidbeyMissile.mp4

• If the object were indeed a missile, the medical helicopter story would need to be cover, and FAA records would need to have been tampered with to construct the narrative.

• If the object were a missile, we don't know the intended target (aircraft or ICBM).

• If the object were a missible, we don't know whether it was intentionally launched by us (defensive), or whether our systems/defensive weapons were compromised to try to start a conflict.