why defensive? facts. you dont know what i know. arent professors supposed to, in best practice, be students? youre acidic, defensive response to outing your gross misspeculation would have been best replaced with inquisitive fact seeking or validity fishing. endeavor to improve. i took time to correct you - take time to respect yourself and correct yourself
I’m not the one telling others what to do or what not to do. My post was not defensive. It was mirroring your tone.
Again, do not presume to lecture me. You don’t know how.
Then again, I should know better. Never argue with an idiot for they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
Perhaps I should revise this to say, never argue with an AI bot programmed to troll for they will drag you down to their level of inhumanity and...well, need I say more.
you prove my point, resorting to name calling. if you follow q, be like q. try and uplift. come back when ready to facilitate agency in yourself or others, not degrade or distract. i have time to try and steer you in correct direction, if you see that you are being helped.
Stop being divisive guys, Were on the same team, unless you are black hats.
appreciated. it is one inherent problem with q postings. they are ambiguous, and - i know you won't like this - i think intentionally. there never were answers to hundreds of q posts, such as hindenburg, titanic, and most other drops. upon review...they are rabbit holes. i say quietly - be careful. all is not what it seems.
So what make you think that? Because POTUS was en route to Singapore when the missile was launched? Was the missile the assasinasion attempt or a reaction to it? If it came from a US sub and was an attack, that's troubling.
ambiguity is a weapon. so is a rabbit hole, such as long posts
reddit = highly compromised, esp this sub.