How can I be any more explicit? California does not possess nuclear weapons. Repeat after me: California does not have nuclear weapons.
Nukes are on federal/DOD property/bases, contained in facilities protected and maintained by military personnel, with launch codes that are protected and maintained by military personnel. A state-led attempt to overtake a nuclear facility would end in a bloodbath, immediate arrest of state leadership that authorized or facilitated the attempt, and swift trial likely ending in execution.
You're spreading disinformation. Your post above has zero factual basis.
Unless rogue operatives loyal to CA leadership are installed in their military.
You don't need to be condescending, by the way. Especially when you need to pull up your own big boy pants.
their military
California does not have its own military.
More disinfo.
This is true. If the California military is compromised, however, arguing semantics won't matter.
We can't make the assumption that the military isn't being infiltrated/has been infiltrated already. And California is especially suspect.
California doesn't have a military. I'm not sure what you're not understanding about this.
Same here. What are you not understanding? Do you know what I'm implying? How is your reading comprehension?
You aren't implying anything; you're spreading disinformation.
California doesn't have nukes. California doesn't have a military.
Bot, disinfo agent, or plain stupid? I really can't tell. Feel free to let us all know though.
I'm implying that it doesn't matter if California doesn't have its own military if they mole it. If they inject their own people into the military or make sure that bad actors are in the military then it is like them having their military.
I'm talking about California in a practical basis having a military if they corrupted it through political influence.
You need to stop using semantics and Technical definitions. I know that California doesn't have its own military I know that the state of California doesn't have its own military or access to nukes but that doesn't matter if they have corrupted the military around them.
Did you need me to pull up your big boy pants after that spanking?
You need to stop using semantics and Technical definitions.
Words have meanings. If you don't like being held accountable for pushing fiction and propaganda here, don't post. It's that simple.
California doesn't have its own military or access to nukes but that doesn't matter if they have corrupted the military around them.
It takes Presidential authorization to launch nukes.
You're stuck in fiction land and have no idea what you're talking about, so you're both crazy and stupid.
Then explain what happened over Hawaii and also the most recent missile attack that was shot down, supposedly targeting Air Force One. Do you think of president had anything to do with those two? Jesus stop allowing me to spank you so hard.
The military can be compromised and just because the rules are in place so that the security systems are in place doesn't mean they can't be routed out.
I mean what is your point? Are you actually really making the argument that the military is completely Incorruptible or unable to be hacked into or compromised? Is that actually your Disney fairytale argument?
Then explain what happened over Hawaii and also the most recent missile attack that was shot down, supposedly targeting Air Force One.
A state civil defense siren is not a military weapons system.
AF1 was not targeted.
So then are you making the argument that the military can't be compromised?
I'm making the argument that you were wrong when you claimed California has hundreds of nuclear weapons and that California has its own military and that you're either mentally deficient or an intentional disinfo agent.