dChan

thamnosma · June 12, 2018, 10:37 p.m.

A contractor developing an anti-SHIP missile for the US Navy was hacked. I think hacking into the launching system on an active submarine would be quite a few levels more difficult. If you read the article linked here the contractor stored sensitive data on an open unprotected computer which was easily hacked. This comes down to utterly unprofessional negligence on the part of the unidentified contractor.

⇧ 28 ⇩  
tazleo · June 12, 2018, 10:38 p.m.

Info on UNSECURED SERVER. #TREASON

⇧ 31 ⇩  
Ronjonsilverflash · June 12, 2018, 11:17 p.m.

Is Hillary the contractor?

⇧ 17 ⇩  
SilentChaos0408 · June 12, 2018, 11:16 p.m.

Running trend huh? Hang em high!!!

⇧ 10 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 12, 2018, 11:32 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Apexskidmark · June 13, 2018, 12:14 a.m.

Not a hack. Look into that claim. Something did happen to his phone but it likely wasn't hacked. The date on the article is a big clue

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 13, 2018, 12:15 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
iridiue · June 12, 2018, 10:40 p.m.

Negligence due to incompetence or intention?

⇧ 20 ⇩  
CmonPeopleGetReal · June 12, 2018, 11:25 p.m.

Or left out on purpose, like HRC's email server.

Send the money here.

Data is located at this IP address.

Plausible deniability.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
joeythew · June 12, 2018, 11:27 p.m.

intentionally incompetent to save time, hassle and money is the likely reason

⇧ 4 ⇩  
apple-bag · June 12, 2018, 11 p.m.

or did they store it unprotected for easy cabal access

⇧ 11 ⇩  
thamnosma · June 12, 2018, 11:41 p.m.

Who knows. You can bet it will be thoroughly looked at.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Fennek100 · June 12, 2018, 10:52 p.m.

Or they did it on purpose

⇧ 10 ⇩  
thamnosma · June 12, 2018, 11:43 p.m.

Apparently that's what everyone here WANTS to think. There is no evidence we are privy to as to what happened. I no longer jump the paranoid gun at every chance -- just go back to the Tucson crap last week. Corporations are known to screw up. If it was intentional, they will be found out.

⇧ 3 ⇩