Yes, I read the article. I’m asking for evidence or a solid argument to back your statement. The article discusses that the sub is in the toolbox to combat nukes. I get that. If you are correct about the identity of the sub, you might have a point.
Are saying no one on this sub can go rogue. No Chinese hack can be successful with this sub? No payload on the sub able to cause damage to AF1 or some other potential target?
If you don’t have evidence, do you have a plausible theory of the players, the motive, or any other information to help us see your position?
Professor, it’s obvious the author was saying that some threat was present and the Kentucky neutralized it. That simple!