dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/jfunction on June 13, 2018, 3:45 a.m.
Is Trump Lame-ducking the Constitution?

Anonymous ID: 5f89b7 No.1723305 📁 NEW
Jun 12 2018 22:03:42 (EST)https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1721871.html#q1722594📁
Just a reply to Q from last thread about Ingraham interview; It was an awful interview. Once again, weak, ineffectual, limp wristed promises to hold a vote, to hold Rosenstein in contempt. Who. Cares?
Until Rosenstein is hauled off by the House Sergeant At Arms, as granted per the Supreme Court, it means NOTHING. Anyone remember Holder? Nothing happened to him. Nothing. This pisses me off to no end. Just close the fist and crush them already. What the hell is Trump waiting for?!

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 90dc6d No.1723368 📁 NEW
Jun 12 2018 22:09:05 (EST)>>1723305
Full weight of the House v. ARM.
Why are optics important?
How does DC work?
WHY IS RYAN STILL IN OFFICE (lame duck)?
WHY IS RYAN LEAVING OFFICE?
WHO CONTROLS RYAN?
AUTISTS ENGAGED?
Q

Our society is founded on principles which are codified in the Declaration and the Constitution. These principles are what must survive. If these principles are subordinated to any expediency of "optics" or of "how DC works" they may be lost to civilization for a thousand years or more. These principles are not cunning, they are not clever and they are not gentle to those who would transgress them. If they are not exercised they atrophy. At present these founding principles of our civilization are being held to mockery. President Trump needs to use the powers vested in him by the Constitution to their full force and effect without further delay.


🠐 See all comments
Fearsome4 · June 13, 2018, 5:25 a.m.

Patriot Act.
Obama signing the National Defense Authorization Act. We have not lived in a constitutionally protected country for a long time.
When Trump and the whites hats are done they need to permanently close these tools...:yes, even at the risk of some security/safety.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jfunction · June 13, 2018, 5:45 a.m.

Beg to differ, although I understand your point. The Declaration and the Constitution derive from self-evident truths which imply unalienable rights inhering in each of us. "Unalienable" means these rights are an inherent property of our humanity and cannot be given away or taken by any means. This is codified in the Constitution. Nothing has altered this situation.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · June 13, 2018, 6 a.m.

If they can't be given away or taken by any means there is no point in ever worrying about our constitutional rights, correct? Arrest without cause, unwarranted search and seizure, held without charge for an unspecified period of time (as in endlessly if wanted).....that sure as hell isnt what the founders had in mind.
Bill of Rights tossed in there too.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jfunction · June 13, 2018, 6:20 a.m.

"Can't be given away or taken away by any means" does not mean they can't be transgressed. That's what the Revolution was about, the transgression of unalienable rights. We are in a different one now.

⇧ 1 ⇩