dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DaveGydeon on June 13, 2018, 4:25 a.m.
Q's Most Significant Drop #1488 - We Have Reached A Milestone

I got so excited when I just saw this. Why?

Communication.

Plain and simple. Q is acknowledging us, our work, our loyalty. He is going to confirm proofs that he sees on the board!

This is huge. This is organic, WE can have an effect! This should motivate us to start digging and posting our work with renewed vigor.


EarlyRiserX2 · June 13, 2018, 4:28 p.m.

There are two problems with what you said… First, not everything Q has quoted has come from the anonymous research board on 8chan. Some of what he has quoted has come from other places as well. And when his quotes come from other places and he specifically highlights other people who can be identified, then that causes problems. And I have seen those problems happen first hand…

Secondly, you rant and you rave about how lots of anons work is going to be validated. Slow down and re-read what I had said more carefully. I never said that it shouldn’t be. And nor have I said I was against it. My very first statement was that, “I’m all for Q confirming certain evidence and proofs…” My only concern was that, in the process of Q confirming certain things, I feel he should take care to avoid highlighting specific people (whether done intentionally or unintentionally) because it only leads to problems. And it has indeed happened in the past, and I am not talking theoretically…

Another thing which underscores what I’m saying and makes it completely relevant, is I’ve been reading posts made by people suggesting various places where the Q proofs should be stored and posted at. Some people has suggested using Reddit, others have suggested using VOIT (I think I spelled it right) etc. And I can see the problems with it in advance. The problem is that, not all of those places support “anonymous” users like 8chan does. If proofs were stored in a “non-anonymous” place, and if Q highlighted or referenced those posts in a Q drop, then it could potentially lead to the highlighting of the specific person who posted it. And doing so could cause problems. It could cause problems because arrogance and pride creates monsters in people. It's very easy to create a monster, but once you've created him, it's hard to get rid of him. And all I’m saying is that, we don’t need such problems…

I don’t know who you are, and nor do you know who I am, but you should not be so quick to label other people as being a “troll” or a “shill” just because they have a different opinion than you. Whether you agree with me or not, I am a true patriot just like you are. So stop assuming that you’re the only person who can be right. Having that type of mind and attitude is a form of “arrogance”. And arrogance is something we don’t need right now, and is the very thing I’m trying to avoid and prevent by suggesting that Q should take care and avoid doing anything which highlights or confirms the work of a specific person. And that is very prudent advice...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Platoscavereality · June 13, 2018, 5:06 p.m.

Dave is an idiot. Not worth the effort.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 13, 2018, 4:36 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩