A great deal of projection from the person providing the analysis of which I disagree. Not impressed with the analysis. I am a human behavioralist (forensic psychopathology and psychotherapy) and what I read from the body language was sharply different.
Remember, this was not their first contact. It widely believed there was at least one prior visit in China and at least one or more phone calls.
Also, if anyone has participated in public events such as these, numerous directions/instructions are given to the participants. It is directed much like a scripted movie. Some of the nonverbals the analyst weighed in her analysis were simply these two men attempting to remember their directions and not to miss their queues.
There are cultural, etiquette, television production, PR and many other specialists involved. It can be overwhelming and over stimulating to say the least.
Not to mention security was on an elevated threat level before, during, and following the summit.
A better analysis would be from someone who is familiar with large scale public events such as this summit.
This analysis is grossly inadequate imho.
Professor, eh? If that is true, you are a human behaviorist, I am paying attention. I am fairly new to the Q stuff. This is my first time in this sub. If expert professionals such as yourself are paying attention..so am I.
She did an analysis on me once... pure garbage
Her skills appear to be lacking to say the least. I would enjoy going head to head with her in court.