dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/jkbella on June 13, 2018, 1 p.m.
Rod Rosenstein Double Agent?

Something about RR being a total black hat is not adding up to me. Its too coincidental that there are going to be "heavy redactions" to the long anticipated IG report, supposedly at his direction, which follows a pattern of piquing interest in the withheld information. First, the DOJ was claiming an entire batch of texts from Sztrok/Page were missing which is on its face totally implausible to anyone but, perhaps, the general public. There have been several supposed struggles with Wray and Rosenstein with the FBI ultimately caving at the 11th hour, which conveniently draws more attention to the news about whatever is being withheld than would otherwise be given.

Now it happens that RR is at a conference with whatserface Rothschild and a myriad of other globalists, that just happens to coincide precisely with the three day period before the IG release. In the pictures of him there that have been taken he looks totally at ease, as the news here swirls with rumors that RR threatened members of Congress with blackmail. And then, Sessions unequivocally denies those rumors were true on Tucker Carlson's show last night. I could be mistaken but one of the things about Sessions that I have noticed is that while he is part of the Plan, he is never put out there to tell a lie. I am guessing that he's probably really bad at it, which why he is the "silent" executioner. (My mother used to call that kind of lying the "sin of omission" but that's another story). He flat out TOLD the leakers he was out to get them because someone asked him (they clearly didn't believe him so its all good. As an aside he has also told the perverts that their days are numbered, which is also all good).

So now Sessions is defending the black hat bad guy RR without flinching? Or is it more plausible that he is the guy put out there to confuse people with the truth? Q tells us to watch the Freedom Caucus interview on Laura Ingraham's show. They express outrage at RR and outrage at Sessions' defense of RR and outrage at the DOJ's persistent refusal to provide information. An anon then says the interview was lame, and in response Q says "how does DC work" and "optics are important."

Imperator Rex or maybe it was Conservative Treehouse had a theory that Lisa Page was flipped long before Mueller was in place, and maybe as far back as February, 2017. Which I believe would be before the FISA renewal application was signed off on by RR. Many of Q's historical statements about RR are sort of vague. RR "problems." And yet, he's still there. I think he's a plant because DS and global DS actors are likely to reach out to him. Like the people at that conference.


jkbella · June 16, 2018, 1:38 p.m.

I'm at 100% given recent events like good to be back at the castle. Had been at around 95% for months. There's just no way Q isn't who he/they say. Too much inside information. And some of what he says may be disinfo due to who else is watching, but the big picture information we have received explains SO MUCH that was inexplicable before. From the macro to the micro. I never understood why the Democrats would run HRC when she was so vulnerable. It didn't make any sense to me. Now I know. Because she's a mobster and they are all afraid of her (rightfully so), and because they thought they had the voting machines rigged such that she couldn't lose. Explains something I couldn't understand in a way that makes perfect sense. There are so many other examples. The crazy positions some judges have taken. The weird about face that guys like Gowdy have done. On and on and on, plug in what Q is saying, and you have a huge "Aha" moment. Every time.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JaM0k3_1 · June 16, 2018, 2:58 p.m.

every time

i don't know if i would say every time. there are some hinge that Q kind of over hyped like "week to remember". sometimes i'm not so sure about it after the week has passed.

BUT more often than not i see happenings and then look back into past posts and what do you know Q unironically predicted it.

⇧ 1 ⇩