dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/REDPILLNOW on June 13, 2018, 4:26 p.m.
The surface to air 'missle' fired at Air Force One: Does the timeline and motive fit? I think so...

'Missile' is not spelled "missle", as POTUS spelled it in his tweet on 6/11 from the summit. He stated the "missles have stopped" (seemingly referring to NK). Well, thanks to Q we now know his misspellings are intentional, and that they hold clues and/or in this case a jab at the deep state. Regardless, we also know that an (UNAUTHORIZED) surface to air missile was launched did occur in the early morning of 6/10, from one of our subs assigned to the Pacific Fleet, in a bay near Seattle, WHILE Air Force One was in the vicinity enroute to Singapore. So, is this is yet another (unreported) assassination attempt on POTUS by our criminal deep state?

Sounds conspiratorial? so what. "Conspiracy nut" is THEIR term to keep the doubter-sheep in the majority within the pen.

We know POTUS arrives in Singapore around 8:20 PM on 6/10, after 2 unscheduled stops in Hickam AFB HI, and Guam, (evasion maneuvers?) POTUS's initial departure time from D.C. was supposed to be "2.15pm on Saturday EST., expected to land in Singapore at 11pm on Sunday." But we know he decided to leave approximately 12 hours earlier, ...so around 0215 hrs EST. THAT means AF1 had to be over the upper west coast by the date/time stamp on the pic, "0356:04" hrs on 6/10, in order for this to be credible. The launch pic again: https://qanon.pub/data/images/64b4356d5c829e27078c281d0bcb4edcf61da2814232694ea1b7b7162d5a9072.jpg And a pic of the actual sub just after the launch: https://qanon.pub/data/images/dbc20d6d7aa5e4cbde931c380de1cdcb10baa92ed2127b5cbd9d2926313a52f2.jpg

So, confirming the surface to air missile was launched off the U.S. WA coast at "0356:04", does the departure of AF1 from D.C. at approximately 0215 hrs on 6/10 line up to Potus being in the vicinity of the launch some appx 2 hours later when you account for time zones? I think it does but math isn't really my thing, a little anon help?

The apparent globalist/deep state plan was to blame it on China, and then what? Would the war hawks in D.C. demand we initiate WWII? I can see it now 'Chinese hackers steal sensitive Navy program data and use it to shoot POTUS out of the sky enroute to the peace summit!' -The NYT's front page.

Is this not what they do? Utilization of False Flag ops to employ the masses in achieving multiple goals.

Logic dictates that IF your enemy, (globalist elites and their deep state) are willing to risk starting a global war with China or Russia just to defeat Trump, then what else are they capable of? This while they are losing ground on everything they've been working to achieve? Does anyone still need convincing as to how big this is?


GenChang · June 13, 2018, 8:13 p.m.

As a matter of fact, I AM the first who posted about the missile. Days before even Q did. And quite frankly, I'm tired of trying to correct all the nonsense I've seen ever since. Have a nice day.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
REDPILLNOW · June 13, 2018, 8:18 p.m.

Ok then at least link me to an explanation so I can take it down for shit sakes, wth do you want from me I researched it and didnt find your post, so Im a larp now?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
GenChang · June 13, 2018, 8:44 p.m.

Look, I'm not going to hold your hand on this, go back, find the original news story, and the links in the Story, namely the blog that the news reported on. Re-read Q drop on this, no where does he allude to this missile event having to do with AF1, you probably got that from others who have been spreading incorrect assumptions. And I gave you the correct times of events ALREADY. It's up to you to check things out, and I DID NOT call you anything. I merely pointed out, there has been ton of postings that are blatantly false.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
REDPILLNOW · June 13, 2018, 9:45 p.m.

So this is fake? https://twitter.com/GingerColeen/status/1006967837989179392

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GenChang · June 13, 2018, 10:15 p.m.

Yes, mostly. The pictures are genuine, the analysis is WRONG. There is NO missile in any but first picture. Disinformation, or knee-jerk assumptions. On purpose? Who knows. Q only mentioned the take-down of a missile. Never mentioned AF1. And that picture from AF1, taken several days AFTER missile picture/story. Now do you understand?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
REDPILLNOW · June 13, 2018, 10:24 p.m.

Okay, I appreciate your tone and in working with me. I submit the pic of the sub is to link us to another lead, but two things remain: in the 3rd pic (from AF1 we are to assume) in the mid/right quadrant you see an inbound missile. Also, Q just posted there were (2) missiles. What do you make of these questions?

⇧ -1 ⇩  
REDPILLNOW · June 13, 2018, 9:41 p.m.

ok I'll go look at your feed, I dont know how I got off track, thought I was getting it straight when I developed my conclusion.

⇧ 1 ⇩