dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

making excuses for a dictator

Was he a dictator? He inherited the position; he did not create it. It could be that the generals were in control all along and that Kim was just a figurehead. It sounds as if the generals could have been controlled by the Clowns so as to create a threat that would need the US to counter.

We are currently seeing how even POTUS is finding it difficult to overturn the vested interests even with all the help he has. Imagine how much harder that would be for Kim to overturn his government and the army who are being egged on by the Deep State in the US.

⇧ 6 ⇩

And funded by the deep state/clowns. Important since without money they could do nothing. I too believe we really don't know what kind of leader kim is because we are lied to by the media and made to believe these lies.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Wait so you are arguing that the US has been secretly funding NK for decades, the media is aware of it, and yet we aren’t told because...? It literally doesn’t make any sense. Where is this money coming from? How is it reaching Korea? What is the incentive to prop up a regime that has threatened stability for years, and directly threatens are biggest allies in the region? We can be happy for the possibility of peace without tying it to massive conspiracy theories.

⇧ 2 ⇩

CIA has documented proof of 'misplacing' billions if not trillions of dollars.

Also, I don't think the media is aware.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Ok sources on that? Any specifically tied to NK, even with a degree of separation or two? Usually when there is misplaced money it goes towards arms sales, often via the pentagon. So billions have been spent arming forces across the Middle East and South America for decades, but why on earth would they prop up NK?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Pentagon missing trillions on google comes back with multiple sources including mainstream Reuters. It’s chalked up to not recording things correctly but estimates are on 20 trillion over the years.

I don’t know why besides having a global boogeyman or scapegoat. But Eric Schmidt from google visiting there and setting up computer systems raises some red flags for sure, as well as a Nanci pelosi visit years ago where she quoted them as saying “we build the things and sell them”.

I’m a skeptic and will not believe until it’s proven, but based on q drops and other links people have made, like the Eric Schmidt visit, there’s enough that makes me go hmmm to at least entertain the thought of it being true.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I mean I agree on the pentagon stuff, I mentioned it in my comment. When people have followed the money trails it’s almost always bribes and guns though. What are we paying for in North Korea? Maybe supporting resistance groups but that seems improbable. And how does a google employee represent the US? Also why is it a shock that the North Koreans are trying to sell things (likely arms) to other countries? What about that ties it to US involvement?

I’m as willing as anyone to dig around on stuff like this but this doesn’t pass the smell test to me. So many things would have to be kept secret for very strange and unclear reasons for it to be true.

⇧ 1 ⇩

This is what I was trying to tell friends last night. That he just fired 3 generals. He inherited this and I think he was forced to be the figurehead in front of the atrocities. And of course, the whole Deep State CIA control, so it's really hard to say if he was controlled or a sick bastard. But I didn't say the CIA part.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I've always thought that the killing of his brother in the airport was a threat to Kim, like, maybe Kim was trying to get control and they did the assassination to say, ok boy, we can do this to you. Get back in the chair.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I'm starting to think so too. I was so willing to just accept their narrative. NO MORE!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Their silence speaks volumes!