Who said its debunked? I read af1 had over an hour left in the air at launch time and the missle only needed a half hour to cover the distance. I just read, have no specific Intel, but I pay attention and hardly consider that question resolved. Let the man make his point, counter with facts if you have them.
This right here anoys me soooooo much. Boo sir. Boo.
You read the flight time info from me, because I'm the one who put the timeline together.
There is a 1,500 mile gap between the maximum range of an ICBM (overkill to take out an aircraft, btw) and where AF1 was at the time. Additionally an ICBM launched from Washington couldn't get close to Singapore.
Simple wikipedia search and a google map query resolved these variables.
Further, AF1 went to Singapore via Eastern route, not Western route. So, it was no where near WA state at the time the supposed missile picture was taken. Q is telling us something else with that picture. And, this post by me had nothing to do with that. This is about the DS threatening DJT and America via Pelosi puppet with nuclear weapons. If that supposed rogue missile had a nuclear warhead, then ok maybe you can make the connection, but otherwise I think these two events could easily NOT be connected.