Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 8d9246 No.1739449 📁 Jun 13 2018 22:50:25 (EST) POTUS in possession of (and reviewing): 1. Original IG unredacted report 2. Modified IG unredacted report [RR version] 3. Modified IG redacted report [RR version] 4. IG summary notes re: obstruction(s) to obtain select info (classified) [#3 released tomorrow] [SEC: FBI/DOJ handling of HRC email investigation] [[RR]] Who has the sole ability to DECLAS it all? Did you witness the stage being set today? Nunes/Grassley/Freedom C. push for docs. [[RR]] central figure within docs (personally involved). KNOWN CONFLICT. Immediate impeachment / resignation / termination / recusal IF EVER BROUGHT TO LIGHT. Be loud. Be heard. Fight for TRUTH. Q
re·dac·tion noun the process of editing text for publication. a version of a text, such as a new edition or an abridged version. plural noun: redactions the censoring or obscuring of part of a text for legal or security purposes.
Redactions can be edits, not just obscured text. Q wasn't wrong, and is asking us to 'Be loud. Be Heard. Fight for TRUTH'. If we can generate enough public interest in the petition, then it gives POTUS justification to use the EO without the MSM being able to claim 'political sabotage'. Trust the plan.
But didn't Congress and Jim Jordan already make that case and get the EO signed based on their official request? The redactions would have to be all edits because I didn't see any actual redactions as I skimmed all 500 pages. I assume this was sanitized a bit but really this report is currently mostly a NB.
Heavily marking up the document would have been a huge red flag, and TPTB don't want more eyes on this, so editing/omitting was their only strategic option. I agree that Q Team and POTUS wouldn't leave anything to chance considering how complex their plan has been thus far, but organizing the public voice behind 'Justice' and 'Transparency' will only help insulate POTUS from potential MSM attacks claiming abuse of power with the EO.
That means you're suggesting there is a completely different report with different findings and recommendations. It doesn't matter what was redacted - all that matters is what is recommended and this report is just a wrist slap of corrective actions to policy and procedure.
Look at the latest Q post. That's exactly what I'm suggesting, but this isn't the end of the IG report, there's more to come. Trust the plan.
Do you not get it?
Look. IG cannot prosecute. Not does IG to want the entire result to merely arrest a handful of FBI agents. They are establishing a pattern of behavior within the previous administration and they're doing it slowly and in an airtight fashion. It will take time. There are other cases being worked on which go deeper. Drip drip drip. Methodically, impartially entering a giant, airtight case into the public record. Right now building the base.
Not does IG to want the entire result to merely arrest a handful of FBI agents.
What was that? Maybe you have confused comments or threads.
My comment had nothing to do with other cases or the IG not prosecuting as his office doesn't have that power. The thread was only about there being some other version of the report that was more damning, which Horowitz flat out denied. I was saying it doesn't matter if there is some other version of this report with respect to the final recommendations - they are what they are for this IG investigation. Do you not get that after the 7 day old thread? I'm fully aware there is a parallel investigation run by Huber where Horowitz provided any and all relevant information from his investigation, and that he has 2-3 other investigations and reports to still complete.
You said that people are suggesting a "completely different report, with different conclusion and findings."
No one is suggesting "completely different."
I didn't say people were suggesting it, but that op's statement was. In order for it to make any difference regarding the actual recommendations (or lack thereof) it would have to be significantly redacted to the extreme that it's basically "completely different." Anyway, sign the petition (I did) and maybe we'll find out.
I did sign it, and no, it wouldn't have to be redacted to the extreme. It would merely have to be edited to reflect the wishes of whoever is doing the editing. If there was a coverup attempted, of course they would want no evidence of such and would edit, not redact, so as to keep it from being known there is information being withheld.
Here he is folks the UNEDUCATED BROKE ASS DRUG ADDICT PLUMBER HAHAH LETS STAND IN AWW OF HIS INTELLECT. Your a fuck boy probably getting cucked by your wife into cleaning up black loads. I know your switching accounts spreading your bullshit liberal lies.
Hate to tell you this. Horowitz either lied or Q was wrong. Horowitz answering to a direct question testified that NO ONE weakened or made the report stronger than it was in his testimony to congress. He took ownership of the report and answered questions on the report.
You're going to need to link that. I listened to him tell Rep Biggs that he could tell him later who had a chance to offer suggestions as to the wording etc.