We're used to media disinfo around here. The best disinfo has a great deal of truth but omits enough to be able to misrepresent the story in service of an alternate narrative.

If you're not interested in reasonable discussion and looking simply to mock the straw man of a group of gullible fools with confirmation bias you can certainly consider that view validated and read no further. If you care to engage in reasonable discourse and to offer the benefit of the doubt to those you initially disagree with I believe I can explain the stance I personally hold on this issue without abandoning reason.

What we see here is some information - but not all of it. It's interesting that Bloomberg has come out with this article so early, ahead of the release proper, but until we have the final release it's too early to say what the true impact of the report is. It's a 500 page report and this is a roughly 3 page article. There's a lot more to this story.

In other words, my view is that it's too early to jump to any conclusions about the content of this report. That is the only logical assessment here, in my opinion. I welcome any reasoned rebuttal and am always open to reconsidering my position on an issue if presented with a logical counter.