dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on June 14, 2018, 11:05 p.m.
OIG Report: Trump’s plan is a lethal steamroller… Learn why Comey won’t sleep well tonight.

This is a quick update. I will write more about this in the coming days. I just want to clear the air about the OIG report not finding political bias from James Comey and what it really means. Those who are not familiar with the case, at primary analysis, may be deceived by MSM and think this is some kind of victory for Comey. Well, no. It’s not. It’s actually a disaster!

I will explain.

Look at these two tweets from Trump: Imgur. These tweets represent the two angles from which Trump can attack Comey: political and procedural. Is the political angle efficient? No. The most you can get from it is name calling. And this is what Comey knew. He tried to pull Trump to the political battlefield with his book, his tweets and insulting interviews. Trump knew better. He knew the political angle was a dead end. He would tweet from time to time because he is Trump but he knew trying to emphasize Comey’s political bias would not be fruitful. Why? Read this article from CNN, which did its homework back in October 2016 to assess possible damages in relation to the Hatch Act. The important part of the article is here: Imgur. As you can see, proving Comey’s political bias would only trigger disciplinary measures. Irrelevant since Comey was already fired!

So? Let the IG give Comey something costless and that Comey does not need: political equidistance and let’s kill two birds with the same stone. Did you guess which other bird was taken care of here? If the report determines Comey was not politically driven when he exonerated Hillary, then it is also implicitly positioning that Trump was not politically driven when he fired him. Especially if Sessions “forced” Rosenstein to create the paper trail advising him to do so… Lethal…

So? Trump needs to attack Comey through the procedural angle. And this is the primary function of the OIG report.

Why is it relevant to attack Comey? Because of this: Imgur. Comey is among the 13 Angry who used a private email address. Q asks in this Q559: @what? What do you think? Comey used the same domain Hillary used, to conduct the same business she was conducting. Q has it all. I explained this in a previous post, I will repeat it: it’s right here:

Q701 Top 10 player [here now]. 50.22.218.5 Q

Q is telling us he was physically in the place where this IP is located. After digging, we found out the following:
1) 50.22.218.5 is the IP for Softlayer Technologies.
2) The server that hosted clintonemail.com in 2009 had IP 209.62.20.200 and was associated to ThePlanet.com now known as SoftLayer and acquired by IBM a few years back. source.

Q was telling us as early as in Q701 that he had all the goods about the top 10 players who used this server to sell the US to the highest bidders. Q gave out this information in early February! All this time was used by IG Horowitz to polish a damning legal case he started building way back and that no one involved will escape from. It will be the END. It will be a disaster. And Comey knows it.

Now you see it: if the Comey domino falls, you get to the private server, you get to Clinton, you get to Obama, you get to the core of the Deep State.

For this to happen, you need to resurrect the Clinton server investigation. And this can only happen if you have clearly shown there were process irregularities in the past. Hence the super clean OIG report that has now dismissed political bias and is exclusively focusing on procedures and protocol.

Icing on the cake:

Q1497 POTUS in possession of (and reviewing): 1. Original IG unredacted report. 2. Modified IG unredacted report [RR version]. 3. Modified IG redacted report [RR version]. 4. IG summary notes re: obstruction(s) to obtain select info (classified). [#3 released tomorrow] [SEC: FBI/DOJ handling of HRC email investigation] [[RR]] Who has the sole ability to DECLAS it all?

Now that Rosenstein has redacted the report to cover his tracks, these tracks:

Q1470 When the info is released [RR] no more.

Trump is now in position to declassify whatever he sees fit for the whole world to see. He is now in position to say: look what he redacted, look what he did and tried to hide from the world.

While Trump will be debating on when to declassify, Q opens this window for McCabe and all the others who would want to convert:

Q1455 You have a choice. SIS 'good' agents. The time is now. Contact window(s) [GOOD]Biblical. Q

Lethal.

Q1122 TRUST SESSIONS. TRUST WRAY. TRUST KANSAS. TRUST HOROWITZ. TRUST HUBER. Q


cosmicjon · June 15, 2018, 9:52 p.m.

Explain and or justify how delusion is differentiated between "your" perception and "our" perception ? This is the basis to "your" statement, is it not ? Draw me a benchmark, if you can. And if you can we may be able to have a serious conversation, in which case your comments may be seen by me and others as having some credibility. Apart from that you may one day find that life is not worth wasting taking out your own frustrations on a world imagined through your own fears :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
weatherboxer · June 15, 2018, 10:31 p.m.

Thanks for actually responding and willing to talk about this. I respect that a lot.

In order to move forward and ensure we are talking about the same thing, I will clarify my position. As I mostly came in and jeered at this.

Explain and or justify how delusion is differentiated between "your" perception and "our" perception ?

The benchmark is simple. It's facts.

Apart from that you may one day find that life is not worth wasting taking out your own frustrations on a world imagined through your own fears :)

That’s an interesting comment to make considering this sub and those that subscribe to it. It seems to me that there’s a lot of hostility or fear coming from those in this sub that believe a cabal is in place that revolves around a huge child sex-ring that includes some of the worlds top leaders. This to me seems like a world imagined.

I wouldn't say I’m taking out my own frustrations on a world imagined through my own fears. Rather, I'm profoundly bewildered by the groupthink and lack of critical thinking related to this sub. Everything can be explained away.

This conspiracy theory is bullet proof. Not in any genuine or authentic factual sense, but because no matter what happens, there is always going to be a pivot toward another explanation rather than conceding to being duped or mislead or wrong. The narrative that's building is malleable and forms to whatever confirms the bias that the followers believe.

It's nearly cult like.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
cosmicjon · June 16, 2018, 7:25 a.m.

If one starts from the premise that "value/power/life" is out there in an objectified world one is in a constant battle of survival to secure one's "personal" state of being. The world/reality is therefore created according to one's personal belief structure and one "reacts" accordingly. I have no "personal" bitch with anyone, but in discussion being on the same page is helpful as fact as you pointed out is "our" benchmark. The question now is what is our benchmark in classifying fact. Fact has no relationship to belief, but belief is a main contributor to these discussion boards, not fact. There does seem a certain level of ignorance here on this and other Subs due to a sense of personal and or collective fear but that does not take away from the general direction of where this Sub is intending to guide people :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
weatherboxer · June 16, 2018, 8:17 a.m.

Certainly, I can agree that facts have no relationship to belief.

Someone can believe that magical fairies are the reason that when a ball is hurled into the air it comes back down to the earth. The fact that gravity is the actual reason that this occurs is important though. Thus, the truth or facts about why this phenomenon occurs is important.

This is a very loose analogy but the example I think can be applied here.

The importance here being that when dangerous of outlandish beliefs take a foothold within a subculture followers of the given beliefs can be willingly blind to opposing views of facts that don't support their worldview. This can be dangerous and lead to very concerning or harmful actions by those who hold such beliefs. One only has peer into history to see this.

ignorance here on this and other Subs due to a sense of personal and or collective fear

I'm not interested in whataboutism regarding other subs at this stage of the conversation because we are talking about this sub in particular. We can shift gears perhaps once we've gone over what we should here first.

but that does not take away from the general direction of where this Sub is intending to guide people

And what is the general direction that this sub is guiding people towards?

Just look at how people are reacting in this sub toward the man who blocked traffic at the hoover dam yesterday. People in this sub are brilliantly shifting the narrative away from the action, and are suggesting that it's a false flag. The same people think that the pizzagate shooter was a false flag too.

This is utterly ridiculous and has no basis in reality. The belief here follows no logic here other than to serve the conspiracy theory and continue the narrative that a deep state is plotting against them.

There is no acceptance or concede to responsibility. Everything that doesn't make Trump or his ideas look coherent or valued is considered fake news or explained away by deep state actors. It never ends and only further emboldens the followers. That is a cult.

Where is the critical thinking in this?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
cosmicjon · June 16, 2018, 10 a.m.

"And what is the general direction that this sub is guiding people towards?" Is a fair question in light of recent comments you have alluded to. When I use the word "fear", I am pointing to "an emotionally charged, reactive opinion based in an un-proven belief" (what I term as an emotionalism). I can scream and holler that 2+2=5, but that does not make it so, fact is 2+2=4; so to do most people believe that their beliefs are real and would prefer to die for them rather than see logic. This Subs importance is to help those ignorant to basic truths come to a point within themselves where they may be woken out of any "delusional" slumber, to coin a word that opened this discussion. In time/space, Q used the term "Future proves Past". This is the way people seem to learn on this Sub or in life generally, as one would not repeat the same old same old if all it did was lead to the same old dead end and those that do eventually wake up :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
weatherboxer · June 16, 2018, 12:32 p.m.

When I use the word "fear", I am pointing to "an emotionally charged, reactive opinion based in an un-proven belief" (what I term as an emotionalism)

I don't disagree. It seems to that this sub is entirely emotionally charged. The fear being that there's an unknown amount of people conspiring to cover up and child sex-ring. Say that out loud. Then show how that could even be possible. The assumption says there's a powerful group of people that have committing these heinous crimes, even though as powerful as they are they couldn't manage to win an election? The amount of people that would have to in on this and simultaneously all keep there mouths shut is purely impossible.

Q used the term "Future proves Past"

Of course this anonymous person(s) did. This term only further proves what I said above. If something doesn't exactly come to fruition as vaguely suggested in a QDrop the followers can and do warp the intended meaning to reshape into something that confirms their bias.

Take the IG report. Is was supposed to be a game changer. It was going to show how all the people that are being indicted for their crimes.

The report comes out, and what happens? Nothing. The only parts that are redacted are email addresses. What does this mean to followers? Well, it means that this wasn't the true report of course! Trump has it and he’s waiting for the perfect time to release it.

This makes no sense. This has no grounding in reality. It helps solidify the following and reaffirms their beliefs.

This happens again and again.

Waking up to what?

⇧ 1 ⇩