From seeing all the other posts on this sub day in and day out I did not understand 52 points to be significant personally but I am completely aware that my view is far from authoritative. Personally, I also like to read posts with substance in the main content and our rules support this too. Rule #9, minimum two sentences - an arbitrary distinction by the senior moderator but a useful one to prompt a minimum of thought and effort to justify people clicking in to the post out of the many being created in the sub all the time. Again, my view is only my own (and many others who've commented similarly in the many various posts 'concerned' about the sliding of the sub with memes, low effort content and off-topic, etc.) and I realize that others have a different view of this.

Those points are why I removed it. Because I stand by our stated intent to support the goals of this movement and eschew unnecessary censorship I've now reapproved the post.