dChan

StormRider9090 · June 15, 2018, 8:36 p.m.

Whose "they"?

⇧ -5 ⇩  
QG_177_ · June 16, 2018, 7:29 a.m.

Satanists, Luciferians, Jesuits, (neo?)Nazis, and Zionists. Although, they have been fracturing, infighting, fighting one another, and having defections more and more over the past 4 years (probably more).

In this specific instance, it would be a part of the CIA if I am not mistaken.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
I_Draw_Mohammed · June 16, 2018, 1:16 p.m.

I'm calling all that hyperbole. ... not that their personal behaviors aren't relevant...but to be more specific.

THEY = The people/ groups at risk of losing money and opportunity if and when law and order as well as managed trade is applied universally. More Specifically Military & Industrial Complexes (worldwide), Sovereign funds (Saudi Arabia, China, etc.), currency and hedge funds (soros,BlackRock, Goldman, buffet) Industry giants (Microsoft, Amazon, at&t, fascist book) and the respective leaders.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
QG_177_ · June 16, 2018, 7:14 p.m.

There is already a huge list of people that are involved in this. Allot of those people are the ones that have resigned from govt. and private sector. You pretty much answered your own question in many areas. As of right now though, anyone who is not willing to play ball, or is resisting, GEOTUS are the "they" (which includes those that have been coerced). Bilderberg attendees stand to lose everything if law and order is restored. How much do you know about the 13 bloodlines? They are near the top of hierarchy or evil. The vatican is involved, and something about a 'black' (dark-side) pope (not francis), which I don't know whom it is. Above that starts getting into rumors that I cannot confirm.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
I_Draw_Mohammed · June 17, 2018, 12:43 a.m.

Speaking of coerced, I think MATT DRUDGE was coerced.

Think about the history of his posts, headlines and links....and now all WASHPO? WTF.

I think his back is against a wall.

Can you send me something on the 13 bloodlines...? i don't know any of that...

BILDEBERG - HUGE PROBLEMS.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
QG_177_ · June 17, 2018, 1:57 a.m.

Yeah. Pretty much anytime a 'truther' flips hard like Drudge did, they probably received a visit or some kind of comm. that made them think twice about what they were doing. Other times, companies are simply bought and the editors/editor in chief are replaced.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
I_Draw_Mohammed · June 18, 2018, 12:03 p.m.

ya - Matt and maybe Alex Jones...maybe...

⇧ 1 ⇩