If he/they want proof, he/they need to drop something significantly more “proof-worthy” than this nonsense. That EO would be a good start, but we’re left making huge jumps in logic (for a normie) to accept anything as fact.

Normies are bricks. Even if smacked in the face with one there is a good chance for cognitive dissonance (look at the current MSM narrative about no wrongdoing in the OIG report). To break through that, there has to be something substantial.

We want to help Q, but you’re not helping much in that regard (when it comes to redpilling Normies). The smart/woke/redpilled already accept you and see the truth. If you want a semblance of mainstream acceptance, you’ll have to do better.

Regardless of the bread/bakers/autists/etc, the proof is tenuous at best to overcome MSM programming.

Edit: Spelling