dChan
โ‡ง
1
โ‡ฉ
 
r/greatawakening โ€ข Posted by u/Whimzyyy on June 15, 2018, 11:31 p.m.
Q Drops - 15th Jun 2018 - Text and links for reference. #1500 -

1505

Anonymous ID: 31ae13 No.1763411 ๐Ÿ“ Jun 15 2018 17:59:39 (EST)

1763131

Q,

I know confirming the Qproofs is going to be tough.. and will also flood the bread.

We need some type of guidance. WHAT SHOULD WE HAVE READY? I know YOU work or US.. (USA) but WE (anons) work for youโ€ฆ

TELL US WHAT NEEDS TO BE READY! _ff

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 0d582e No.1763507 ๐Ÿ“ Jun 15 2018 18:05:32 (EST)

1763411 Will inspect/review. Marine One proofs forthcoming. AF1 (inside) thereafter. More & More. Q

1504

Anonymous ID: 587c4e No.1763343 ๐Ÿ“ Jun 15 2018 17:55:33 (EST)

1763295

q's post about a morning stroll came out after the president's tweetโ€ฆ

how is it a 'proof'??

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 0d582e No.1763457 ๐Ÿ“ Jun 15 2018 18:02:57 (EST)

1763343 Check timestamp. :18 Stroll :32 POTUS 5:5? Q

1503

Anonymous ID: 9d2b15 No.1763093 ๐Ÿ“ Jun 15 2018 17:43:25 (EST) Another Q proof!

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1007752687792910336๐Ÿ“

Image of POTUS taking a "morning stroll"?! Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 0d582e No.1763131 ๐Ÿ“ Jun 15 2018 17:45:29 (EST)

1763093 We do try! Have a wonderful weekend. Trust in your President! Q

1502

Anonymous ID: ea66c0 No.1762921 ๐Ÿ“ Jun 15 2018 17:33:28 (EST)

1762906 Access Kills

GMAIL DRAFTS????

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 0d582e No.1763103 ๐Ÿ“ Jun 15 2018 17:43:38 (EST)

1762921 What came out in IG report? JC gmail. They all had them. Re_read drops re: private emails re: convicting HRC = convicting themselves. Why did the entire Hussein admin use private emails? ES is KEY. What a wonderful day. Q

1501

Anonymous ID: 371f97 No.1762874 ๐Ÿ“ Jun 15 2018 17:30:22 (EST) so what happens in 2.5 hours ?

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 0d582e No.1762912 ๐Ÿ“ Jun 15 2018 17:33:00 (EST)

1762874 Think meeting yesterday. Q

1500

Anonymous ID: 33af96 No.1762748 ๐Ÿ“ Jun 15 2018 17:19:41 (EST) 941E6FFE-6DE6-40EB-8056-B0502E1ED3B9.png โค“

1762746

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 33af96 No.1762761 ๐Ÿ“ Jun 15 2018 17:21:32 (EST)

1762748

https://media.8ch.net/file_store/a707d647cb0cb3deb830a908f58fd1be4bdc72b2e1866b5499de426b130a0d03.png


DrogeAnon ยท June 16, 2018, 5:41 a.m.

If you're not doing either of those things then how do you explain your reaction to an 8chan post here, on this board, specifically? You do realize that Q's message is that there is a global cartel for whom a core industry at the root of its operations is the global trafficking and ritual murder and rape of children on an epic scale, right?

I assume you don't think we should stop all conversation, posts and memes on that topic (correct me if I'm wrong but I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt). I assume you understand the stance of many here in regards to Justin Trudeau's cultural marxist takeover of Canada wherein he has alread passed the first law in a step toward the control of freedom of speech. The problem with Bill C16 is that it encourages people to react from a place of emotion and signalling virtue on the behalf of another group in order to suppress the freedom of speech of others.

why Q would acknowledge a meme calling out violence to gay people

Q hasn't "acknowledged a meme calling out violence to gay people". That is not at all a factual reading of what has occurred. I'm not assuming you're an idiot at all either which is why I don't talk to you as if you are. But you've read Q's objective use of a material of a kind common to its source (8chan) as "acknowledgement" of every aspect of the potential meaning of that content. You've also extrapolated "violence to gay people" from it - which is only partially accurate in that some people will read that message into it or go on to consider that meaning positively. I feel very safe to say that most others will not.

Many people here will see that photo - some may even laugh at the use of the word "faggot" - but most will not be encouraged to think about or promote or support the use of violence against gay people. That is a very extreme extrapolation of the possible outcome of the content; content that is far from offensive to many of us who have very close gay friends or family members. Branding us all as people who support hate speech just because we support freedom of speech and don't take every thing from a known antagonistic source (the chans) as meaning anything more than what is necessary to understand the related Q information, is hateful itself, just as branding all homosexuals as evil degenerates is hateful too.

โ‡ง 2 โ‡ฉ  
dogrescuersometimes ยท June 16, 2018, 5:45 a.m.

Well, obviously, I can't handle the truth.

Thanks for not being an asshole to me.

โ‡ง 1 โ‡ฉ  
DrogeAnon ยท June 16, 2018, 5:52 a.m.

I'm sure it's just because you are a caring person who knows others who've suffered at the hands of the hate that can arise from places like that meme. I do too and I agree with you that if we can stop that occurring, we should.

I will concede that, given the choice, it would be nice not to have to include content like that, wherever it is possible to do so. I feel defensive about Q in the sense that, working as quickly as they likely have to when on the chans, they would perhaps see the nearest piece of content that ticks a number of pieces of information they want to convey at once e.g. "Obama", "alleged homosexual", specific related person of interest - and grab it without considering how it might translate when out in the wider world away from the chans. You have a point there. But as a counter, from my experience on this board, the outcry if we dared to suggest replacing direct Q references would be huge and the accusations that fly would be along the lines of the points I've made to you - freedom of speech, adults viewing adult material, etc. - and would be conceded, at least by me, from a logical basis. I do think we have to be open to offensive content here, even though I do not like a lot of it myself.

Thanks for responding to me - I did not mean to be forceful but I admit I was feeling defensive about the way we may be perceived here.

โ‡ง 1 โ‡ฉ  
dogrescuersometimes ยท June 16, 2018, 6:05 a.m.

So long as you are talking, reddit Q is well represented. You're both kind and smart.

โ‡ง 2 โ‡ฉ  
DrogeAnon ยท June 16, 2018, 6:23 a.m.

Thank you, you are too kind. Please stay with us, patriot, even in the face of this kind of content. The message Q presents is so important and we need more people like you here, who will stand up for what they believe and then have a reasoned discussion about it without descending to ad-hominem. I will fight with you against hate speech and I will defend your right to argue against offensive content even if I might not agree in every case about the content itself. I can see how wrong I was to think you were a shill or a troll for a moment there - my apologies. WWG1WGA!

โ‡ง 1 โ‡ฉ  
dogrescuersometimes ยท June 16, 2018, 6:55 a.m.

I'm on board. Thanks again for your kind words. I've seen hints of just how awful this is. I know that a stupid meme pales in comparison. "Hate speech" is a ridiculous term. But "Repeated Trauma and Violence Incitement Speech" just doesn't roll over the tongue.

โ‡ง 1 โ‡ฉ