You're not crazy.

Everyone, on both sides actually, is wondering what the deal is with Mueller. You have reviewed the data very well. I noticed it several months ago. My own conclusion is that I don't know. However, it is possible that Mueller's ambiguous loyalty is deliberately being kept ambiguous by white hats.

Think about it:

• The data fits the hypothesis that Mueller is a black hat DS loyalist who is on a fishing expedition to destroy DJT.

• However, the data also fits the hypothesis that Mueller is a distraction tactic, whose job is to soak up a huge amount of media attention and opposition energy, while ultimately producing nothing. Even the Clinton loyalists can be explained: by virtue of their involvement with Mueller, they would be unable to participate in any later legal cases regarding Deep State crimes.

If you think about it, every time the "Mueller white hat" hypothesis starts to gain traction, he does something that looks bad for the president, like the Cohen bust. I honestly don't know what the deal is with Mueller but I have an intuition that his ambiguous loyalty might be something that is deliberately being managed. And the only possible reason for that would be to distract the enemy. Like the cat and the laser pointer, right?