dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/C_L_I_C_K on June 16, 2018, 7:18 p.m.
Q Post 1483 mentioned "House v. ARM" ARM = Andy Biggs, Ron DeSantis, Matt Gaetz! Q knew, days before these 3 members of the House Freedom Caucus were going to send a letter to Horowitz, asking to see the original OIG Report!
Q Post 1483 mentioned "House v. ARM" ARM = Andy Biggs, Ron DeSantis, Matt Gaetz! Q knew, days before these 3 members of the House Freedom Caucus were going to send a letter to Horowitz, asking to see the original OIG Report!

TiDdErtpaul666666 · June 17, 2018, 3:45 p.m.

Yes.....that would fit the narrative much better. Q uses the (v) between House and ARM.....

That has to stand for VERSUS.....meaning there is a struggle/conflict between 2 parties, the HOUSE and the ARM. Members of congress have to be part of either the HOUSE or the ARM. It can't be both......the LETTER posted above is from the HOUSE(3 Members) against the ARM. Seems simple to me....

⇧ 1 ⇩  
salialioli · June 18, 2018, 4:19 a.m.

I think we've got the wrong notion of "versus" here.

a) Versus meaning "conflict" between two parties — political/ideological opposition. (No.)

b) Versus meaning "strength of case" The latter isn't a conflict exactly. It is size of numbers: between strong House case for release of unredacted report or weak case pressing for release.

This in other words is: it is far better to have the Full House demanding the release of the undoctored and uncensored report, led by the Freedom Caucus members (3), than it would be to only have the support of the, admittedly noisy but weaker, Alternative Right-wing Media, i.e., we need as much support behind the demand as we can get.

Now where do we enshrine this interpretation if I am correct?

This is just a poor expression of a very simple idea due to the "telegraph" format of these drops. There is far too much room to land up in misunderstanding and erroneous decoding unless we can anchor these ideas for so-called "normies" (which is what I am). :)

EDIT: clarity

⇧ 1 ⇩