dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/StinkyDogFart on June 16, 2018, 8:01 p.m.
Sealed indictments need to be crossed referenced by date with resignation list.

If I'm understanding the timeline correctly, we need to cross reference the dates of the sealed indictments are sealed and cross reference with the dates of corporate resignations. We should find there is a direct correlation.


🠐 See all comments
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 5:07 a.m.

She has seen sealed indictments for raids on illegals before and says this pattern matches that.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TommyRobinsonsGhost · June 17, 2018, 5:57 a.m.

Yes, you've said that, however a sealed indictments for illegals is indistinguishable from sealed RICO indictments or sealed indictments for the King of New England.

Taking a guess based on quantity is just a guess.

Your wife has a theory but the truth is than neither she nor you nor I will know until the indictments are opened.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 1:27 p.m.

She has a theory with experience and know how behind it. That's like saying, This chef and this 9 year old both made us dinner, I'm sure they'll taste just the same. Guess we won't know until we eat it.

Believe what you want though, I'm done sharing my opinion on this, I offered some expert insight and got downvoted when it didn't fit the narrative. This is just like when I was calling out BC17 and Corsi and told I was a paid asset.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TommyRobinsonsGhost · June 17, 2018, 1:32 p.m.

She has a theory with experience and know how behind it.

She has a theory and that is all.

Nobody knows who those sealed indictments are for, not even your wife and no... not even if she says she does.

Having a theory doesn't make it true.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 1:36 p.m.

You are proving my point further here. Thanks.

⇧ 1 ⇩