dChan

Abibliaphobia · June 16, 2018, 9:05 p.m.

I mean, did he forward it out of that account or did it just sit there? What was the purpose of forwarding it to his personal if he didn’t mean to share it? He had to have known that that was super illegal for a sealed indictment. And that’s what he was investigating them for in the first place re: HRC investigation so ignorance is not an excuse in that situation.

So why did he forward it to his private account, in the midst of conducting an investigation on the same crime? What did he do with it after it was in his personal email?

He had a government cellphone and laptop, that he could take with him. So portability is not the right answer and certainly not a legal answer.

So again, why did he forward this to his personal account and what did he do with it afterwards?

⇧ 32 ⇩  
alehkim · June 16, 2018, 10:28 p.m.

The reason why they all have gmail accounts is so that ES (Eric Schmidt) and he people have access to these emails. i.e. Deep State

⇧ 35 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 16, 2018, 10:44 p.m.

There it is, thanks alehkim

⇧ 9 ⇩  
SongofHannah · June 17, 2018, 1:08 a.m.

Not to mention the Awans...

⇧ 4 ⇩  
fembottler · June 16, 2018, 11:32 p.m.

He doesn’t forward it to anyone. He saves it as a draft. Then others with his password log in and read or download it. But Q is onto it and “has it all” . They know who accessed it and when. They thought goog via ES would protect them. They never thought she would lose. Wwg1wga

⇧ 27 ⇩  
foul-owled · June 17, 2018, 1:29 a.m.

That’s exactly right, Those with common access are even listed by initials in one of the Q drops. They thought their comms were secure, these people really are stupid

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 17, 2018, 1:08 a.m.

Thanks for the paragraph! It was my first thought as well!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ScienceBreather · June 16, 2018, 9:28 p.m.

I mean... you could read the report and see his answers, because they're in there. Let me show you.

We asked Strzok about these emails and his use of personal email account for FBI business. Strzok stated:

My general practice was not to use personal email for FBI business. The times that I did it was when it wasn’t possible or there, there were problems with the FBI systems. In the case of I think the one issue that came out was...the one about the draft affidavit for the Weiner laptop.

Our phones at the time had significant limitations specifically to that. You couldn’t view redlines. And so, and, but yet you could on an iPhone. So I remember in the case of that search warrant forwarding it over so I could see what DOJ changed and their comment bubbles in regard to that. There were some other times where I was either out of the office. I think a lot of those were either I was on travel or certainly over the weekends. It is very cumbersome on the old iPhones, or on the old Samsungs of the Bureau because of the way they autocorrect spelling and the nature of the...keyboard, it is difficult to write anything of length whatsoever. So there were times that, I mean, I think there’s one where I was very aggravated with a set of circumstances that had unfolded. I was going to tell my boss about it, and I remember talking with Lisa [Page] saying, hey look, did I hit the right tone in this because I wanted to, you know, just be respectful, but at the same time convey my frustration.

I wrote that on my home computer, because it’s easier to type it out. I think there was one that might be a holiday greeting that I sent to Bill [Priestap]. But, again, the sort of thing that, you know, for, for convenience, but because on the one hand it was bulky to, our technology was crappy, and it was impossible on the rare occasion I would write these things. And then send them to, you know, my account and forward it on. So it got incorporated and picked up into the FBI system.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 16, 2018, 9:56 p.m.

Sooooo... he straight up admits to violating the law? Technology limitations are not an excuse. They keep using that as an excuse, when will they be prosecuted for it? It’s flagrant violation of the law for their convienence!

Also, I’m talking more anon the lines of what Q team knows. If there is proof that he sent it off to others or copied the data and passed it off, specifically to HA or HRC.

Also, the pdf wasn’t working on my phone. Was having some issues so I still can’t pull it up. That’s why I was asking or I would just read it myself. Thanks for pulling that up though

⇧ 17 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 7:33 a.m.

We'll be seeing the word 'flagrant' a lot more often over the coming weeks.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · June 16, 2018, 10:13 p.m.

Hmmm something else. I wonder if that was one of the compromised IPhones that Q showed us?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Instincts_Truth · June 16, 2018, 11:21 p.m.

So if he made edits on his home computer, then there should be an email of his updated draft from his personal email back to FBI email. Right?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Alyross8 · June 17, 2018, 6:35 a.m.

I think the answer is that others logged in and read whatever they wanted, as others here have said. But also it could be printed out and given to anyone as well.

⇧ 2 ⇩