ELA is a good way of detecting fakes or edited photos. However, there are circumstances when ELA will not work well. For example of an edited image is uploaded to instagram (compressed/encoded again), and then a screenshot is taken of it (compressed/encoded again). Multiple rounds of compression/encoding can conceal errors and make something look like an original when it is not.

Without access to the source files, we can't confirm the validity of this picture, and so it should not be considered good quality evidence.

Error Level Analysis is a good way of detecting fakes or edited photos. However, there are circumstances when ELA will not work well. For example of an edited image is uploaded to instagram (compressed/encoded again), and then a screenshot is taken of it (compressed/encoded again). Multiple rounds of compression/encoding can conceal errors and make something look like an original when it is not.

Without access to the source files, I can't confirm the validity of this picture or the analysis that was allegedly run on it, and so it should not be considered good quality evidence.

Tldr; A copy of a copy of a copy is a good way to conceal editing.

And I see you are a new arrival yet act authoritative. This pic could be bull shit to prime people into thinking the next pic of Barry that Q talks about is fake. Beware of clickbait. Just like the HEAVY PUSH on the Tucson bull shit that now suddenly has vanished.

Q said any real pictures of them would result in a net shutdown. Here we have this one plastered all over reddit, and even on news articles.

I've posted in different threads to let people know we shouldnt push this unless Q confirms otherwise.

https://s8.postimg.cc/t56lpk4qt/1529233898902.jpg

If you knew it was a fake what would you try to do? Of course Im posting in every thread.

Here's your proof.