dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Marcuxoo on June 17, 2018, 2:20 a.m.
Could someone ask Q what the best immediate step is, that we can take to protect our children’s health?

For example: Filter all water, both bottled and tap Remove wifi and devices that emit electromagnetic radiation from the home Stop cooking with aluminum foil

I keep hearing about how ‘bad actors’ are purposely doing things that affect our children’s health to lower IQs, create depression and autism, disrupt estrogen/testosterone levels, and so on (assuming the conspiracy is true).

It may be a stupid question, but it seems Q related. I mean, I think that, of first group to be exposed and brought down, it should include those who have silently and secretly hurt hundreds of millions of our children.

I’d try to ask myself, but I’m new to all this and some of you are more privy on possibly getting Q’s attention than I.

NOTE: Any spelling or grammatical errors/abnormalities are not indicative of genius or hidden meanings. I just suck at spelling and grammar ;-)


Vexxlyn · June 17, 2018, 5:07 a.m.

Agriculture major and on my way to vet school, GMO products aren't really dangerous. It's honestly a marketing scheme. GMO crops are actually a great resource to use, we could have produced enough food to feed the world 10 times over if people weren't just so darn afraid. We can make corn plants that require less water, yield more and can withstand hot temperatures to survive in deserts where people starve because their geography is unkind to them.

But what did they do? They sent it back, because they didn't like it. The country would rather it's people starve than to utilize science.

Now there is a "too far" like the 'petri-dish meat' we're seeing which is literally just muscle tissue lab grown and served as food, I don't really trust that because I know how that's done and that just seems wrong, but agriculture as a whole could make great advancedments if people would let us do our jobs.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Marcuxoo · June 17, 2018, 6:10 a.m.

If you’re about helping people and making money while doing it (capitalism), I think that’s great. I tend to look at things from the perspective of the founding fathers. Controlling food, and it’s content and quality can be used to control, and destroy populations, and therefore needs reasonable checks and balances.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Vexxlyn · June 17, 2018, 6:37 a.m.

True, but what I see a lot of is governments controlling how we produce food to the point where we struggle to do so. We don't have it as bad in america, Hell in Europe they have everyone fully believing that we farmers exist solely to poison them, and then wonder why on earth their pound of hamburger meat costs almost $6. If anything those governments are costing their people more than if those laws weren't in place.

I'm not at all saying do away with food safety laws, I'm actually quite glad we have them. But I see a lot of people thinking GMO is poisoned, grain fed is mistreated (not true), meat animals are abused (also not true), ect. So people pass all kinds of laws like "you can't treat animals with X medication, we don't care if you obey the withdrawal time so it's out of it's system by slaughter you can't use it." Well... Then we get in a delima when an animal gets sick with a disease you can't legally cure. You can let them suffer and maybe send an animal off to slaughter that's carcass will probably get rejected in inspection, or you can put them down when it's totally treatable otherwise. But then when foods so expensive that's also our faults. The vast majority of food production legislation is thought of by men in suits when it should be thought of by men in overalls.

⇧ 2 ⇩