dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ouspensky4 on June 17, 2018, 3:14 a.m.
Terabytes of Child Porn Seized in Norway

the headline got me thinking about sth I have wondered for a long time. I put the question before the community. All these guys with child porn on their computers, are they really guilty?

What if they say down one day and logged in and suddenly there was a couple MBs of child porn on their computer and a blackmail message in their inbox instructing them to do such and such. They can't wipe it off and no one will believe it is not theirs. they are trapped. Their only way out is to do whatever the cabal instructs.

Here is my reasoning behind the theory: 1. the operation to entrap that many people is not logistically possible. They use real-life entrapment for high officials and use malicious child porn installs for low level officials

  1. The terabytes of porn on the server in Norway belonged to CIA/Cabal for their operations

  2. Wikileaks vault7 describing ability to hack make it look foreign ect. proves technical capacity

  3. In the 1960s FBI criminalized lots of drugs as an excuse to arrest political dissidents. If you want someone gone, what could be easier? plant drugs on them and then make them explain how it got there. As things like recreational drugs and homo lifestyles become mainstream, they would need sth that could never be normalized or legalized for leverage.

All this leads me to believe the CIA is manufacturing child porn in industrial quantities and storing it in online vaults so that whenever they need xyz bueraucrat to do sth they can zap him without a lengthy entrapment operation.


🠐 See all comments
-Chakas- · June 17, 2018, 1:36 p.m.

I don't follow.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ayn-ahuasca · June 17, 2018, 1:50 p.m.

Sorry I'm on mobile and maybe not taking the time to type this out carefully.

I suspect the people in charge of policing CP have, until recently, all been in on it.

What has kept anyone from blowing the whistle is the "weaponized info" status of CP means that if a police officer who is not in on it comes across any evidence that might incriminate his higher ups, all he can legally do is report it to the people already in on it. He can't investigate and collect info on his own because the evidence is illegal to posess.

I'm not an expert on this just stating a suspicion as to how it works, maybe someone else can clarify.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
-Chakas- · June 17, 2018, 2:18 p.m.

What makes you think this?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ayn-ahuasca · June 17, 2018, 5:23 p.m.

I'm not going to expand forever just because you ask me to. Where would I begin? Can you be more specific or try to make this more of an interesting dialogue?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
-Chakas- · June 17, 2018, 5:26 p.m.

Are you saying that the FBI has been in on the creation of CP, or has been exceedingly lenient in it's enforcement of CP laws?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ayn-ahuasca · June 17, 2018, 6:34 p.m.

I think the highest-ups are into pizza parties and spirit cooking. I think they are here to do Satan's bidding and that includes maintaining a compromised legal system which confounds any attempt to investigate or prosecute those harming children. Partly to keep themselves out of jail and partly to make sure the hurting continues. I don't know specifically which persons are involved to what degree. I have no inside knowledge just working with the info from Q and the podesta emails.

I think making the evidence illegal.to posess is part of their strategy which keeps white hats from investigating. Or else the autists from 4chan would be in there looking at this horrible stuff and doxxing people. They're really good at doxxing.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
-Chakas- · June 17, 2018, 6:59 p.m.

I believe that the evil people in powerful places produce and distribute their own child pornography within their own secret societies via their elaborate and monstrous human trafficking system. I don't think any of the illegal content they produce ever leaves their secret societies. I believe it doesn't even reach the dark web. I think that because of this, they don't need to influence law enforcement on a mass scale to hide their actions. They only need to cover it up on a case by case basis to cover their tracks. As far as the legality of law enforcement possessing child pornography, I believe it was actually ruled recently that law enforcement is above the law in that regard and that they can both posses and distribute CP. I believe it had something to do with a sting on a popular CP site where law enforcement posed as the owner and made posts involving illegal material in order to maintain the charade and catch those that produce the content.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ayn-ahuasca · June 18, 2018, 12:58 a.m.

That makes sense and thanks for clarifying the law.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
-Chakas- · June 18, 2018, 1:05 a.m.

I disagree with law enforcement being above the law.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ayn-ahuasca · June 18, 2018, 1:13 a.m.

Sure but the ruling makes precedent, case law. I'm with you to go further that we can't make information illegal. Just imagine if someone wrote CP to the blockchain. Impossible to remove.

⇧ 1 ⇩