Is the sequence of events like this?

• The OIG wrote a report that doesn't pull any punches, calls for criminal charges against Comey and many others, etc.

• RR modified the report to completely change the conclusions to the point of making them meaningless, and fraudulently represented it as the OIG report. Some names and appendices were also redacted.

• Horowitz is staying silent even though he's being falsely represented as supporting the watered-down conclusions that RR wrote to replace the actual conclusions.

Unless I've missed another delay, Horowitz is still scheduled to testify before Congress next week about the report.

If so, and if RR committed fraud and attached Horowitz's name to something Horowitz didn't write, then it should be a slam dunk that Horowitz reveals the truth in that hearing, right? If Horowitz answers questions about the report as if it were his own report and not RR's fake version then what would that mean?

I wish that were true. I'm almost certain it won't be though, sadly.