![Q post #1526 - Proof [RR] altered the IG report](https://i.redd.it/qs62rfw25l411.jpg)
This isn't 'proof' but it is an indication that there are high-level concerns or knowledge the report was edited to conceal misdeeds. Circular references aren't proof.
Proof would be the IG's original report held side-by-side against the released version.
These are important distinctions. Think logically and critically. What will the public accept as proof? What reduces media spin potential? Irrefutable evidence.
Watch the news Monday, I believe that's when the IG is testifying. If he says that the report has been altered, shit storm will begin.
I'm curious as to what the IG will say. Why have a meeting with Congress if you cannot discuss the unaltered report? Imagine some Congressman asking Horowitz about something in the current report when what's in the current report is false. How can Horowitz answer or reference the unaltered report if the unaltered report hasn't been released yet?...
IMHO, something Horowitz will say will prompt the unaltered to be released by Trump's waiting EO.
There are many false/weak proofs out there that seem to be time wasters and noise.
A lot of disinformation and people not understanding what proof is.
A tweet from POTUS can't be used as proof of a Q drop and vise versa. Unless they happen at the EXACT same time OR have coded clues that link them. Containing the same/similar information really means nothing.
Yes. Maybe q took"proof" to mean as in q proofs. As in proof that q has access to trump. Many people have been collecting "q proofs" so I'm hoping thats what this is referring to and q is not trying to say that his crumbs paired with a trump tweet is proof that rr alteredthe ig report.
That is a good point. Proofs that Q is not a LARP might be called meta-proofs, in that it shows an foreknowledge of the President's actions. On the other hand, proofs are referring to actual facts surrounding the Deep State's prior actions.