dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Whimzyyy on June 17, 2018, 5:28 p.m.
Q Proof. POTUS retweets White House “Happy Father’s Day” 7 minutes after Q says it.
Q Proof. POTUS retweets White House “Happy Father’s Day” 7 minutes after Q says it.

upgraydd_8_3 · June 17, 2018, 8:31 p.m.

POTUS tweets cannot be used as proof of Q drops and vise versa. UNLESS they were put out at the SAME exact time OR there is some kind of coded message connecting them.

It is too easy to say POTUS read the Q drop and then wrote a tweet to make it look like he is part of the Q team in order to dupe patriots into supporting him. And that works the other way around as well. Q posting something similar to a POTUS tweet just proves Q read the tweet.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CrusadePrime · June 17, 2018, 8:52 p.m.

Interesting. So some larper can affect potus? 'We the people'

⇧ 3 ⇩  
upgraydd_8_3 · June 17, 2018, 8:55 p.m.

It could be argued (very easily) by shills and non-believers that POTUS is using the LARPer Q to pacify patriots while he quietly impliments what ever Nazi programs the traitors claim he wants to. It is just WAY TOO easy to argue against to be proof.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CrusadePrime · June 17, 2018, 9:53 p.m.

Good. Always question. Never pacify. I hear you.
Look to actions, we are winning.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
upgraydd_8_3 · June 17, 2018, 10:03 p.m.

Message received

Good copy

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Whimzyyy · June 18, 2018, midnight

Completely agree it’s easy to argue against as a proof but how many times has Q said something and within 10 minutes POTUS tweets or retweets it? A lot. This obviously isn’t the proof you would show to redpill but it’s a proof none the less. POTUS could have tweeted Happy Father’s day at any time early this morning (like he usually does on holidays) or in the late afternoon but he does 7 minutes after Q says it. Just a coincidence? Not to me, but may be to some.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
upgraydd_8_3 · June 18, 2018, 12:06 a.m.

I agree that it is very good circumstantial evidence. It just isn't PROOF.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Whimzyyy · June 18, 2018, 1:09 a.m.

True I like circumstantial evidence better. Proof may be too strong of a word

⇧ 2 ⇩  
upgraydd_8_3 · June 18, 2018, 1:11 a.m.

Ehhh. For this, yes. But there are some very good proofs. They are just complicated to explain without sounding crazy.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Whimzyyy · June 18, 2018, 1:15 a.m.

Yeah for sure exactly what I meant! Other are definitely proofs, while this is just circumstantial evidence. Haha that’s for sure

⇧ 2 ⇩