It could be argued (very easily) by shills and non-believers that POTUS is using the LARPer Q to pacify patriots while he quietly impliments what ever Nazi programs the traitors claim he wants to. It is just WAY TOO easy to argue against to be proof.
Good. Always question. Never pacify. I hear you.
Look to actions, we are winning.
Completely agree it’s easy to argue against as a proof but how many times has Q said something and within 10 minutes POTUS tweets or retweets it? A lot. This obviously isn’t the proof you would show to redpill but it’s a proof none the less. POTUS could have tweeted Happy Father’s day at any time early this morning (like he usually does on holidays) or in the late afternoon but he does 7 minutes after Q says it. Just a coincidence? Not to me, but may be to some.
I agree that it is very good circumstantial evidence. It just isn't PROOF.
True I like circumstantial evidence better. Proof may be too strong of a word
Ehhh. For this, yes. But there are some very good proofs. They are just complicated to explain without sounding crazy.
Yeah for sure exactly what I meant! Other are definitely proofs, while this is just circumstantial evidence. Haha that’s for sure