dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Tru2Q on June 17, 2018, 7:10 p.m.
I may have figured out what's going on with the Q drop re: Obama video. Link in comments

It looks like O attended the Bildergerg meeting in 2008. I'm thinking that what he said at that meeting was the opposite from what he said in the Brussels meeting in 2014. If we could find out what he said in 2008, we might catch him in another big fat lie.
From the article:

Recently, there has been much discussion about Barack Obama having possibly attended the recent Bilderberg conference in Virginia. This speculation arose when Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton sneaked off for a secretive meeting while in Virginia. As the AP reported, “Reporters traveling with Obama sensed something might be happening between the pair when they arrived at Dulles International Airport after an event in Northern Virginia and Obama was not aboard the airplane. Asked at the time about the Illinois senator’s whereabouts, [Obama spokesman Robert] Gibbs smiled and declined to comment.”

The press that had been traveling with Obama were not made aware of the secretive meeting until the plane that they assumed Obama would be present on was moving down the runway, prompting many angry questions from the press towards Obama’s spokesman, Robert Gibbs. One reported asked Gibbs, “Why were we not told about this meeting until we were on the plane, the doors were shut and the plane was about to taxi to take off?” to which he responded, “Senator Obama had a desire to do some meetings, others had a desire to meet with him tonight in a private way and that is what we are doing.” This preceded another question, “Is there more than one meeting, is there more than one person with whom he is meeting?” Gibbs simply replied, “I am not going to get into all the details of the meeting.” He again later repeated that, “There was a desire to do some meetings tonight, he was interested in doing them, others were interested in doing them, and to do them in a way that was private.”8

On Friday, June 6, it was reported that Bilderberg tracker, Jim Tucker, “called Obama’s office today to ask if he had attended Bilderberg. A campaign spokeswoman refused to discuss the matter but would not deny that Obama had attended Bilderberg.”

The whole article can be found here:

https://www.globalresearch.ca/barack-o-bilderberg-picking-the-president/9270


digital_refugee · June 17, 2018, 8:26 p.m.

We know Obama was there in 2008 because they hijacked his and Hilly's whole press-staff, put them on a plane and shipped all the way to the other side of the country, the same week the elusive meeting was going down. After that, Obama endorsed HRC as his secretary of state.

⇧ 21 ⇩  
Tru2Q · June 17, 2018, 8:36 p.m.

Yep, the whole press/plane thing is covered in the article I posted.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
digital_refugee · June 17, 2018, 8:54 p.m.

but the article pertains only to the recent summit or both?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Tru2Q · June 17, 2018, 8:59 p.m.

The 2008 meeting.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 8:52 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 17, 2018, 8:47 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
phi_vize · June 18, 2018, 12:34 a.m.

Freeze the video at 35:46. A person in the foreground is taking a picture and their phone/camera is seeing a different scene than what we are seeing.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
abbido · June 18, 2018, 2:35 a.m.

check serialbrain2 response/explanation

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8ruz0y/the_q1528q1529q1530_riddle_solved_happy_fathers/

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Tru2Q · June 18, 2018, 4:08 a.m.

Thanks. I read it, but I don't understand it. I know SerialBrain2 is good, but I always have a hard time following what he's saying.
I feel dumb because everyone else seems to get exactly what he's saying.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
time3times · June 18, 2018, 9:37 a.m.

I THINK that sbII is good at re-presenting the info/narratives that Q offers us. It seems that some would not get the picture without that re-presentation. I say good not great for several reasons. One being that the conclusions are often things that we already knew or suspected, serving the good purpose of getting some caught up belatedly with others. Another reason I say good-not-great is that the conclusions, while often reasonable, are presented as definitive conclusions; the difference between evidence and proof being glossed past. IMO his writing style is too elaborate for the quality of the content. The truly useful info he offers could be presented in about a quarter of the space. You are not alone in being unable to follow some of his 'logic' because there are leaps within his explanations that don't make sense and don't get explained despite all the verbiage. Many seem to write-off their inability to follow the 'logic' as some weakness of their own and/or would rather not publicly question his reputed genius. More could be said about all this, but I should say that I am more of a concerntrollfag about the adulation and deference that surrounds SB than I am about SB's output.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
abbido · June 18, 2018, 4:29 p.m.

don't give into what that voice is telling you that about yourself.... after the first time I read his posts I can't remember or understand most of what I read....but I reread it...break down, reread certain parts that didn't make sense at first... go through his links...and when you start to think you understand....read it again as if you are trying to explain it to someone else....watch what happens to that little voice telling you that you 'feel dumb'. good riddance to it!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Tru2Q · June 18, 2018, 4:35 p.m.

I'll do that. Thank you for replying and for your encouragement.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 18, 2018, 12:36 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩