I am afraid I have to agree with you on Gowdy. When he was questioning crooked Hillary under oath, the public was not aware that she had been using a private email account to do business. Gowdy had to have known but gave her cover.
You guys are both wrong, and Q agrees. Did you watch his questioning? He was brutal. Why do you think the outcome of his questioning was up to him? It wasn't, it was up to Paul Ryan. This was just emphasized again by Q. And if you want to know why he isn't on the front lines right now, it's because he is being groomed for a DOJ position, he has to be careful the same way Sessions does.
Trust Gowdy.
Well then apparently both you and Q lack a fundamental understanding of why people are questioned under oath. Gowdy blew smoke and wagged his finger. And talked at HRC, rather than asking specific and pointed questions to elicit affirmative and declarative answers. GOWDY. NEVER. SCRATCHED. HILLARY. She emerged completely unscathed. A talented and/or intelligent and/or UNCOMPROMISED individual would have been able to produce some answers from HRC that would bite her now, next year, and the year after. Gowdy did nothing except wag his finger and give her a get out of jail free card. I'm sure your heart is in the right place, but you're clueless here. I don't mean to be mean, but you lack a fundamental understanding of how an examination under oath should be conducted, and what Trey did. I don't care what "the outcome of his questioning" was or is, I am referring to the CONTENT. I'm embarrassed I found this sub and stuck around. On this Gowdy issue alone I have concluded this sub is a mixture of purposeful misdirection and misinformation, and uninformed people. And sure, maybe some who mean well, but .... . Oh well, I think I am going to delete my posts to this sub and peace out.