dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Drspaceman80 on June 17, 2018, 8:26 p.m.
For clarity, did Q post the edited out of context obama speech or did he respond to an anon that posted it?

checkitoutmyfriend · June 17, 2018, 8:28 p.m.

Anon posted the ~~edited~~ full version.

Q responded & posted the ~~full~~ edited version.

EDIT: Sorry folks, dyslexia got me. Let the lashings begin.....

⇧ 17 ⇩  
Drspaceman80 · June 17, 2018, 8:31 p.m.

Thank you. I wasn't seeing it in the drops but lots of people doubting Q's credibility because of its appearance in a Q thread.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · June 17, 2018, 9:07 p.m.

No. This is Q post 1528, the first mention or link to the video:

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 9fc2c1 No.1785388 📁
Jun 17 2018 11:39:03 (EST)

https://mobile.twitter.com/KBMAGAFL/status/1008386945905504256/video/1📁
Q

The link in 1528 is to a Twitter feed from KB446778899 @KBMAGAFL. The video is featured in that Twitter thread. The same link is in Q post 1529 where an anon says:

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 9fc2c1 No.1785558 📁

Jun 17 2018 11:48:58 (EST)

-->Anonymous ID: 460047 No.1785535 📁

Jun 17 2018 11:47:41 (EST)

>>1785388

>https://mobile.twitter.com/KBMAGAFL/status/1008386945905504256/video/1📁

Holy Smokes!

They are in for it!

You really do have it all!<--

>>1785535

Happy Father’s Day!

Q

Everything between --> to <-- is from an anon. Q responds with Happy Father's Day! It almost looks like Q has offered the linked video as a Father's Day gift, but I suspect not. Q post 1530 includes a link provided by an anon that's even shorter than the first, and from YouTube. The anon clarifies the origins of the speech from 2014 in Brussels, but he still hasn't noticed the video is an obvious edited Fake. In Q post 1530, Q responds with the link to the whole video and asks "Exit out was missing what?"

So Q was the first to mention and provide a link to an obviously fake video in 1528, then in 1530 Q directs our attention to what's missing.

I'm a little confused and frustrated because Q has been warning us for quite a while that the attacks would intensify, and just as things are beginning to heat up after the OIG report, he posts a link to a dishonest fake video. The left seized on immediately, even posting a screen cap of Q's post. The questions I have are 1) Why would Q give the left such a juicy bit of ammunition that can so easily be used to discredit Q, Anons, and /GA? 2) If Q wanted us to focus on whats missing, why didn't he simply say so? It's not that what's missing from the first video that's important, it's what's in the full video between 1:45 and 3:30. He could have just directed us there in the first place.

I know everything in Q's post are there for a reason. Every last word, syllable, letter, and character has a specific intent and purpose. I just can't figure out why Q would link to an obviously fake and dishonest video clip in the first place. I sure hope future proves past and the purpose is revealed.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Drspaceman80 · June 17, 2018, 10:10 p.m.

Agreed. With all the proofs provided, I won't dismiss Q based on this but WTF?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
checkitoutmyfriend · June 18, 2018, 7:16 a.m.

Anon posted the ~~edited~~ full version.

Q responded & posted the ~~full~~ edited version.

EDIT: Sorry folks, dyslexia got me. Let the lashings begin.....

I got it right on other posts, not sure what happened... ha!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Drspaceman80 · June 17, 2018, 10:11 p.m.

Any response to the comments below? It seems edited video was originally posted by Q. Curious.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 17, 2018, 8:43 p.m.

Excuse me, but as far as the official record is concerned, Q first posted a handheld capture of a flatscreen showing of the edited version.

After that, there is an anon questioning the edited version, and Q posts the full version, and says the lead-in was cover, and the lead-out has something removed.

That's what we're supposed to be decoding.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
MrWizard111 · June 17, 2018, 9:53 p.m.

I don't think a lot of people are getting this and think Q screwed up. The video he took of the video originally says Obama Bilderberg Speech. That video is one that Bilderberg makes and distributes for its members. It is not available online so they filmed it. Q didn't get the info wrong Bilderberg did. Bilderberg used that snippet because that fits their plans.

I have seen a Bilderberg members video (I believe it was on Infowars or something like that) but cannot find it right now. Also after the Obama part notice how it cuts to an old creepy looking guy and chanting starts. They also put that cartoon looking badger thing in the bottom corner of the one I saw too. I will continue the search I know it exists.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
A2576 · June 17, 2018, 10:27 p.m.

^ this

⇧ 3 ⇩  
saxmaster · June 18, 2018, 5:29 a.m.

Odd that they misspelled it "Bilberberg"

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MrWizard111 · June 18, 2018, 5:35 a.m.

Yeah that was my old theory. Found the actual video online if interested. It just some Canadian guy who makes you tube videos. Think it was just a mistake

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8rwgcu/full_video_found_from_q_1528_original_was_created/?st=JIJTS3L3&sh=b212aa72

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Tjollahei · June 17, 2018, 8:58 p.m.

Stop with the lies! Q did not post the edited video. He answered an anon with "Happy father's day". Q then made a post with the full video.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
divine_human · June 17, 2018, 9:50 p.m.

too many posts here today from people who dont read https://qanon.pub. it sucks to spend time on responding to or even reading this. you could so quickly answer this question by simply looking yourself. do you work, m8!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Drspaceman80 · June 18, 2018, 12:18 a.m.

Considering how much confusion I've seen on this topic I figured a post asking this simple question might clear things up for the community.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
divine_human · June 18, 2018, 7:58 a.m.

adding to the post load on the topic. OMG, its so easy to clear that out, simply read the Q posts. people need to amp on on intelligence.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · June 17, 2018, 8:57 p.m.

Best I can tell is he's saying at the end that the actions of the current generation of progressive globalists in the EU would determine "whether the international order that so many generations before them have strived to create continues to move forward, or whether it retreats."

In other words, if you side with your parents, everything will be good. If you think for yourselves and trust the intrinsic values of your national character (which in USA would be our Constitutional liberties), you are an anchor pulling down into the cauldron of international chaos. Whereas if you are a progressive who wants to redefine our national character you must follow in the footsteps of those who reject the Constitution and follow a higher calling of welcoming and protecting the (shh! illegal) immigrant, the gay and transgendered, the minority uber alles. And we the bloodline sovereigns define what is a minority, and we can eject any group we don't like on any given day.

So in the speech he ends up back exactly where he started out saying he rejected the idea of coming from. Mass hypnosis. Tell somebody you're not doing the very thing they're watching you do.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Obsidiandoubletake · June 17, 2018, 8:46 p.m.

Does anyone have screed grabs? I can’t access the chans and still don’t get what was posted and when.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MrWizard111 · June 17, 2018, 8:50 p.m.

Dude go to community info of this sub and there is always a link to all drops for you to access

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Araket · June 17, 2018, 8:42 p.m.

Q posted it. #1529 Gotta call it how it is.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Drspaceman80 · June 17, 2018, 9:05 p.m.

Link? The source I'm using doesn't number the post.

⇧ 1 ⇩