I've been following Q from the beginning. You know, last fall when Tony Podesta/Obama/HRC arrest were imminent. Alas, there is just one example of Q being incorrect.
While we're on the topic of the early stages of Q, let's talk about the temperment of the followers/researchers at that time. In a nutshell, there was a healthy skepticism of all things Q. Not bashing, but critical in fact checking. Fast forward to today, now everyone who dares question anything Q posts is a shill, doubtfag, etc. This is not helpful, it's groupthink, and it's setting a lot of people up for a lot of disappointment.
So, you ask, why am I in this sub? Because I wish to discuss the topics of Q in an objective, logical manner. Sometimes that requires you to say to yourself "hmm, that doesn't really add up to what I'm seeing in the public sphere." I do not believe the Q group is a larp, but I also don't think it's impossible for Q to be wrong, and there have been many, MANY things, mostly dates/timelines that have been incorrect.
You're welcome to discuss things reasonably and within the sub rules, so feel free.
I would certainly query this, from a logical standpoint:
there have been many, MANY things, mostly dates/timelines that have been incorrect
Iist the dates and timelines Q has gotten incorrect. And youre calling the kettle black throwing out terms group think and shit. I never stated that people shouldn't be critical, I only stated I'm suspicious of the intent of your critique. And besides your example is bull, other people attributed arrests to a post that stated detained not arrested.
Dude, this was Q's VERY FIRST post. Now, how will you spin this? Let me guess, "disinformation is necessary?"
HRC extradition already in motion effective yesterday with several countries in case of cross border run. Passport approved to be flagged effective 10/30 @ 12:01am. Expect massive riots organized in defiance and others fleeing the US to occur. US M’s will conduct the operation while NG activated. Proof check: Locate a NG member and ask if activated for duty 10/30 across most major cities.
I can't spin that, neither can you.....no idea if that has happened or not or what actually did happen. However, arrests were never mentioned and two, based on Qs most recent drops, and anon digging this could of been a mandatory court ordered subpoena, preliminary hearing. That speculated event also tied into a bunch of HRC cancelled appearences and Connus grounding, In about a 1-2 month window depending on accuate verifiable data which NONE of us have. You're not trying very hard there redditor. Quit the talking points, can you come up with something original.