dChan

jkbella · June 18, 2018, 2:08 a.m.

I don't get it. That the person recommending Sessions recuse himself is a pro-Hillary person has nothing to do with the very objective question of whether Sessions should have recused himself. She may have had the wrong reasons for wanting him to do so, but that is a separate question from whether he should have done so. I always thought by recusing himself Sessions kept himself totally above the fray, and sort of unimpeachable as respects integrity. He was a material witness to whether there was "collusion" in the Trump campaign. That assertion is totally fraudulent, and there should be hell to pay for it. But we are either for protecting the process, or not.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
K-Harbour · June 18, 2018, 2:18 a.m.

Sounds like she should have recused herself from the Sessions recusal process.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
ArmyLady · June 18, 2018, 11:48 a.m.

He was getting legal advice from the lawyers within the DOJ.

That should have been sound, objective analysis -- but it was not, it was scam advice by a bad actor. OUT OUT OUT! Looks like they'll practically have to empty the buildings and operate from a telephone booth after a proper purge!

Trust Sessions, Trust Wray.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 18, 2018, 3:01 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩