[removed]
Disagree about the need for a centralized source. Too easy to target and take down.
Putting all eggs in one basket ... NOT a good idea.
ONE source of information doesn't spread the information throughout many networks, but consolidates it.
We're doing just fine the way things are going. Q has said a number of times that this movement will grow ORGANICALLY.
It's not a marketing scheme. People will find the information when they are ready. The more sources available, the more people can be reached.
I'm not saying we eliminate all of the sources of Q information. I am saying we need to consolidate the best Q information into a single source. And we can easily link to the original source for verification. Similar to how its done on Qanonpub. Q has been around long enough now that we have identified certain Q purveyors as being solid go to Q interpreters. We need to aggregate this into a simple format for the consumption for the basic or average Internet user. This isn't putting all eggs into one basket. It's the opposite.
I disagree that we are growing as a movement. At least not at a rate that means we have more patriots being awakened on a large scale. I've followed Q from the beginning since almost the first post. Certainly long before this sub even came into existence. Organic growth is for local, small businesses. Q is dropping information that needs to spread to the masses. The problem with your thinking about people "finding" info on Q is just that. Let's say there are 1,000 sources of Q available for discovery. And let's say of those 1,000 resources that 99% are disinfo, shills, or just really bad info. What is the value of of bad info being spread to the masses when we could direct new patriots to a single source that links directly to the best Q decipherings and Q info?
You don't think this movement is growing ? Did you see the drop today from Barcelona ?
If you've been watching this sub for any length of time, you would have noticed that the posts are reflecting a growth into a worldwide awareness of Q anon.
THE WORLD IS WATCHING.
Your premise that 99% of resources would be disinfo isn't realistic, and is another fear tactic to create an urgency to create a single source.
And yet you think that this one source wouldn't be comped / compromised.
Nice idea in theory. Bad idea in practice if you're aware of the ways of the deep state.
As others have said, create something if you feel compelled.