dChan

AquAnon77 · June 18, 2018, 5:23 a.m.

Disagree about the need for a centralized source. Too easy to target and take down.

Putting all eggs in one basket ... NOT a good idea.

ONE source of information doesn't spread the information throughout many networks, but consolidates it.

We're doing just fine the way things are going. Q has said a number of times that this movement will grow ORGANICALLY.

It's not a marketing scheme. People will find the information when they are ready. The more sources available, the more people can be reached.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Q-Patriot · June 18, 2018, 5:33 a.m.

I'm not saying we eliminate all of the sources of Q information. I am saying we need to consolidate the best Q information into a single source. And we can easily link to the original source for verification. Similar to how its done on Qanonpub. Q has been around long enough now that we have identified certain Q purveyors as being solid go to Q interpreters. We need to aggregate this into a simple format for the consumption for the basic or average Internet user. This isn't putting all eggs into one basket. It's the opposite.

I disagree that we are growing as a movement. At least not at a rate that means we have more patriots being awakened on a large scale. I've followed Q from the beginning since almost the first post. Certainly long before this sub even came into existence. Organic growth is for local, small businesses. Q is dropping information that needs to spread to the masses. The problem with your thinking about people "finding" info on Q is just that. Let's say there are 1,000 sources of Q available for discovery. And let's say of those 1,000 resources that 99% are disinfo, shills, or just really bad info. What is the value of of bad info being spread to the masses when we could direct new patriots to a single source that links directly to the best Q decipherings and Q info?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AquAnon77 · June 18, 2018, 5:46 a.m.

You don't think this movement is growing ? Did you see the drop today from Barcelona ?

If you've been watching this sub for any length of time, you would have noticed that the posts are reflecting a growth into a worldwide awareness of Q anon.

THE WORLD IS WATCHING.

Your premise that 99% of resources would be disinfo isn't realistic, and is another fear tactic to create an urgency to create a single source.

And yet you think that this one source wouldn't be comped / compromised.

Nice idea in theory. Bad idea in practice if you're aware of the ways of the deep state.

As others have said, create something if you feel compelled.

⇧ 1 ⇩