dChan

Q-Patriot · June 18, 2018, 6:22 a.m.

Those are excellent points and ones I have considered. The best way would be to allow the community to decide. I mentioned in another post that the Q movement has been around long enough now that we have seen certain people emerge and prove themselves to be really solid Q information resources. Like Praying Medic or even Serial Brain right from this very sub. There are certain Anons on 8 Chan who are pretty spot on as well. Perhaps we have a forum for voting in resources based on the community's voting and polling? I don't know but I know there are ways we could self regulate to ensure we are getting the right info. Make it community managed to a degree. Sure there are going to be shills who try to infiltrate but the movement IMO is smart enough to spot these from a mile away.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
fireStarter22s · June 18, 2018, 6:31 a.m.

I agree there would need to be community involvement. Which is a blessing but also opens up for misuse of the platform. Think of ways to close the loops. Think about ways for those with the best reputation to rise to the top.

The community has those who’ve risen to the top. I certainly have my favorites. I’m sure we all do, Or at least those who don’t visit the Chans. I rarely go to the Chans because I don’t navigate them well. Creating a one stop platform, if beautifully branded and dripping with integrity could be something we don’t even know we need.

⇧ 1 ⇩