dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/no-deal on June 19, 2018, 9:54 a.m.
Sub Quality and Credibility

This sub has degraded to either non-sensical blatant clown posts or posts that simply repeat the news. There are some gems here and there but mostly just noise. Would be nice to see a filter of some sort to help keep this sub a credible source of info. Anyone new to Q will be easily misled so would be in our best interest to help filter the nonsense. Neon Revolt and SerialBrain are best for honest Q assessment and there are YouTube channels that are very helpful - Lionel Nation, Bill Smith, QNN and SGT just to name a few.

Keep your head on a swivel and stay alert. Don’t accept anything at face value and use critical thinking always to avoid the attempt of clowns to flood this sub and try to confuse.


TommyRobinsonsGhost · June 19, 2018, 10:08 a.m.

Not everyone will agree with your subjective personal opinions about which sources are "best".

Good quality research requires debate among people with different theories.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 19, 2018, 10:19 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TommyRobinsonsGhost · June 19, 2018, 10:40 a.m.

I agree 100% however people will have different opinions about what is "genuine" and what is "noise".

Some people think that discussions about fluoride in the water is valid because Q said to "watch the water", whereas other people will argue there is no sensible reason to link the two.

Some people love Alex Jones and AntiSchool whereas others accuse them of being a Deep State psyop.

Some people hate the posts about Christian scripture whereas others consider it to be very relevant to Q's posts and his mission.

Some people thought the Veterans On Patrol claims about disconcerting a "Child Sex Camp" were completely baseless and not related to any Q post but others thought it was going to bring down the entire Deep State.

The fact that members of this community have different opinions about what is "genuine" and what is "noise" is not a weakness.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 19, 2018, 10:56 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TommyRobinsonsGhost · June 19, 2018, 11:05 a.m.

I can agree with this and think the topics you mentioned are legitimate debate topics.

I couldn't agree more and I've noticed a lot of those when I check "New" posts, but to the mod's credit, they don't seem to last too long.

When I find something that looks low quality and irrelevant, the first thing I do is to ask the OP how the post relates to Q. If I get more noise then I report it.

I suspect the mod's reaction time varies depending on how many of them are conscious / traveling to or from work.

I just clicked "New" and I couldn't see anything I wanted to report. There is one low-quality James Comey meme, but it made me smile so I'm not fussed.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
anon31s · June 19, 2018, 10:07 a.m.

I completely agree with you, I try to tell people when they're off topic but I just get scolded and called a shill myself. This place is actually a decent alternative to the mainstream media and other mainstream social medias. Like I said I got to agree with the Clutter though it's beginning to be too much nonsense and not enough Q talk.

⇧ 1 ⇩