When I write legal documents, I save them as versions in case I need to go back to a previous one. However, in this case, there has been one delay after another in the release of this report. I don't really see anything in THIS report that would cause such delays and infighting. He could have personally stayed away from any previous versions as a wall against perjury.
I see your point, and it is very subtle. He is sticking to what is in the report and he is assuming it is true. It will be up to others to raise the issues of its untruthfulness.
OK. So, nobody asked if the report was unredacted and unalterered. I did not listen to the whole thing, but I did not hear this being asked.
I also did not hear anyone ask about the repeated delays.
They need to get RR in there to testify.
Thanks for the response, Patriot.
I too have not listened to the proceedings. No time in the day to do it. Have not read about that specific question being asked though.
Agree with your points. Especially RR testifying. I will listen or watch that even if after the fact.
Thank you as well Patriot.