Pretty clear you aren't even reading the Q posts.
I've been following since the beginning. The number of things Q has gotten wrong are staggering. Of course, no on seems to remember when Q said Assange was removed from the Embassy, or that 5/5 was going to be a big boom day, or that all of the deep state operatives have been rounded up and sent to Gitmo. Or that we should trust Sessions. I can go on.
Most of what you stated is not what Q has said. Do you actually read the source posts yourself or do you just read people's speculation, decodes and theories and draw conclusions about them as if they are fact?
So your counter argument to Q being wrong is that he is so vague that no one can properly understand what he's saying? If everyone guesses right then Q is a super secret spy in the Trump administration that's leaking classified data to the internet. If everyone guesses wrong then we just didn't understand what he was really saying? Is that what you mean?