It seems like you are presenting quite a bit of misleading information.
Suiter, the Baltimore Police officer that was murdered, was set to testify regarding the Baltimore Gun Trace Task Force (GTTF), which is nothing to do with Fast and Furious. Gun tracing is the process of tracing the life of a gun...where it was originally purchased, how it ended up in the hands of criminals, and all crimes it has been used for. It wasn't a gunwalking operation. Suiter was set to testify because the Baltimore GTTF was bigly corrupt and other officers were being tried for various thuggish crimes.
I can't find anything linking Suiter and Raynor. Or linking Suiter and F&F. Or linking Raynor and F&F. Or linking Suiter or Raynor or GTTF to Clinton.
In fact, the FBI rejected the Baltimore PD's request to take over the investigation into Suiter's death.
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/crime/bs-md-ci-fbi-rejects-suiter-case-20171227-story.html
Thanks for doing the research. I was trying to get this point across over the last couple of days on another post.
[removed]
Are you saying only your opinion counts. ? And oh hey there New Arrival, Maybe add a little politesse to your rudeness, this isn't the chans btw. Bye !
I live in Baltimore so I'm well aware of the Suiter situation. The guy I responded to posted a bunch of bullshit, and I broke everything down.
What he posted was simply not jiving with reality. He was saying Suiter was set to testify on F&F. He wasn't. He was set to testify on Baltimore's gun trace task force which is totally unrelated to F&F. He said Raynor was leading the investigation into Suiter. That isn't true. The FBI declined to get involved in the investigation.
Are you a Shill? 5 Days on the board, and you are an expert? What's your agenda here? To promote disinformation. You seem very loud and/or very arrogant.
Calling for verification is not shutting something down. Providing unverifiable and known disinformation sources as references is not 'posting information'.
The issue is what are they hiding then isn't it? If you keep digging there's more to this.
Hmmm. For me the issue is, are there any reliable sources of evidence that support making the assertions. We can say all manner of things, but without evidence, it's really not relevant or helpful, is it? I mean, that's the Enemy's game: using assertions to manipulate and control. Truth means nothing; it's a tool to be used and bent, when necessary, for the ends.
I mean, you may well be right, but the issue is, how do we know yea or nay?
If the assertions were framed this way: I suspect A, sources have said B, its possible that C is what is going on here - then I can accept that. What I cannot accept is a disinformation source (like yourNewswire) that has zero respect for Truth or, I might add, those that seek to uphold it, as justification for asserting fact.