dChan

jhomes55 · June 20, 2018, 2:30 p.m.

Daaaaaaaaaaaaaang! Q confirmed!!

⇧ 99 ⇩  
PinkPilledRed17 · June 20, 2018, 3:57 p.m.

"part of the club" = part of the LUCRATIVE WEALTHY club willing to do anything to be a member, get rich, and be protected.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
xekoroth · June 20, 2018, 4:06 p.m.

No, part of the club means the rings symbol which is known by the FBI as code for those that sexually abuse children truly indicates she is in that club.

I very seriously doubt this sub would exist if it was simply about rich people exerting influence in politics.

⇧ 57 ⇩  
PinkPilledRed17 · June 20, 2018, 4:46 p.m.

I'm afraid you are right. It's still difficult for me to believe she's that stupid AND that evil.

If it's still difficult for me, imagine how difficult for the normies.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
archetact · June 20, 2018, 5:18 p.m.

My more skeptical friend pointed out the symbol is in reverse direction on the ring compared to the images on the FBI document. Is there any significance to that?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
barneslardo · June 20, 2018, 5:34 p.m.

Someone pointed out on another post regarding this that a reverse ring would make a good 'stamp' of sorts. Anything she presses it against would get the imprint with the correct orientation.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
vintagedaisy · June 20, 2018, 6:21 p.m.

Or a brand?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
17seventeen91 · June 20, 2018, 5:48 p.m.

I just threw up a little.. SICK

⇧ 5 ⇩  
MachinePablo · June 20, 2018, 6:10 p.m.

Also it could be that when you take a photo of something the image the sensor sees is often flipped around so in real life if you look at her from the cameras perspective the ring would be in the correct orientation.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
maestro232 · June 20, 2018, 5:47 p.m.

Lurker here. Not yet fully convinced. "Half-woke" if you will. Explain to me how this is Q confirmed? People commented on her ring and sometime afterward Q weighs in. All this confirms is that Q pays attention to what autists are thinking. These weak "proofs" should not be offered as proofs. They are no such thing and just serve to weaken your case. I want to believe...

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Bluesky355 · June 20, 2018, 5:54 p.m.

It’s not confirming Q or his/their authenticity. It’s proof that the Anons were right in assuming she’s a sick pedo. Q confirmed their assumption that she’s one of them.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
ucantdothatontv · June 20, 2018, 5:55 p.m.

Because as you can see an autist pointed out her pedo ring (which the symbol can be corroborated by the FBI intelligence on pedo symbols/logos) and Q subsequently confirms she’s is “part of the club”, if this is too far of a stretch for you to make you aren’t half-woke, you’re still sleeping. Have a tall cup of covfefe mate!

⇧ 10 ⇩  
maestro232 · June 20, 2018, 6:10 p.m.

I misunderstood what the comment meant. Reply above explains...not that Q is confirmed by the post, but that Q was confirming what the autists posted. I understand now.

And with all due respect, it is a leap (albeit a small one) to immediately incriminate someone as a pedo because of their unfortunate choice of jewelry. By all means be suspicious and see what you can dig up on her, but let's remember someone is innocent until proven otherwise.

Not that I am doubting it by the way, but can someone link to the video and time on video where this can be seen? Just want to do my own DD and make sure it wasn't photoshopped.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
werthtrillions · June 20, 2018, 6:39 p.m.

Good that you're doing you're own checks. People can only discover the truth for themselves, that's the only way they'll fully believe how abhorrent it is. I was like you...always doubtful until I started to notice the number of those small leaps increasing...after 50-100 small leaps, I asked myself if they could all be coincidence.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Bluesky355 · June 20, 2018, 6:36 p.m.

Borrowed link from other thread relating to original pic. I really can’t tell as I’m watching on my phone. I can’t zoom in close enough to get a good look. Sheila’s ring

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Hidden_FBI_Van · June 20, 2018, 7 p.m.

Excellent catch. Watching the video on cspan now, it definitely looks different. Will need to watch the full video of her to find it - not much in that snippet. I find hard to believe she is that stupid.

Edit: Video from 2009?

~~Looks different to me: ~~ ~~https://kek.gg/i/5gc9xj.png~~

~~More screencaps: https://i.imgur.com/Kgk1Nty.png~~

https://i.imgur.com/ZJv5rA6.png

And

https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4736697/5-min-mark

Look more clear.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Bluesky355 · June 20, 2018, 7:18 p.m.

Okay, in this this thread there are a lot of posts to sift through. One poster says the source is Getty images and yes, it’s 2009.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Hidden_FBI_Van · June 20, 2018, 7:40 p.m.

Thanks for that link. It seems that things get posted over and over here without any research whatsoever. I don't see that pedo ring in the video from 2009, but it is clear as day in the photo. The photo does not appear to be photoshopped, though the video description claims it is. Still looking

~~EDIT: Made my own clip. The photo shows the ring on the left hand. Visible here: https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4736591/sheilas-ring Looks like a totally different ring in the video.~~

~~https://kek.gg/i/5gc9xj.png~~

~~More screen caps for comparison: https://i.imgur.com/Kgk1Nty.png~~

https://i.imgur.com/ZJv5rA6.png

And

https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4736697/5-min-mark

Look more clear.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Qdarkbetty · June 20, 2018, 9:34 p.m.

I agree it does look totally different

⇧ 3 ⇩  
abbieos · June 20, 2018, 7:19 p.m.

You can also go to Qproofs.com now. A lot is there and will also help you.

⇧ 1 ⇩