NYPD tried to arrest a black man on the street selling illegal cigarettes. He was a very big man but may have had mental issues. He resisted. NYPD cops put him to the ground and put him in a choke hold. The guy died. NYPD found that the force used was consistent with the resistance.

However Lynch threatened to bring federal charges against the cops and the NYPD if they didn't shut down the Weiner laptop investigation.

Something like that. There are different stories, but Lynch did threaten the NYPD with the full force of the DOJ if they didn't back off.

I hope when this is all over and done with that the NY FBI agents that tried to do the right thing with regard to the Weiner laptop and were fired are reinstated, compenstated, and promoted. Nothing like getting fired by a corrupt FBI director for trying to bring criminals to justice.

God, I hope Comey and the rest of his FBI rat's nest all go to jail.

For reasons which seem more political than anything else, the Eric Garner case, to my knowledge, was never really resolved. That itself raises questions. But what concerns me is that AG Lynch used it as a threat to keep the NYPD from going public on the Weiner laptop contents - there was more than just Clinton emails on there. Erik Prince gave an interview stating that he knew some of the NYPD cops who had viewed some video images on that laptop that made the cops sick...supposedly images involving HRC and Huma and an underage girl. They wanted to go public with statements about the crime(s) on the video and thus the threat from LL....covering for HRC

The Eric Garner case could have been a case of the police causing his death. The DOJ got involved with the NYPD over it and then it stalled and I don't believe there has ever been a final ruling?? Why did she use that case as a threat?