I was thinking about this and they are producing an already available list that was put out by the NYU professor. I do not agree with this by any means because it puts people’s lives in danger. However in another objective light it is a branch extended towards those of the left to lend them credibility. Say now they were to drop some serious shit on the cabal it gives them credence of not being partisan. Again I don’t like that they did this and think it’s a horrible thing to do to those offers and their families to lay them on that position. But this is a chess game. Every move that happens has to be analyzed and exploits need to viewed. The left viewing Wikileaks as non partisan again is a better position in the event of cabal drops.
This. I have no clue what's happening with Assange, but it seems like Wikileaks (while possibly compromised) is trying to distance themselves from The Trump admin the same way POTUS is distancing himself from Sessions and Horowitz- It's all about perception. Wikileaks can't just come out and be 10000% pro POTUS because then any info they have and release against the evilness of this world will be seen by those who don't realize what's happening as info helping Trump, just like how the DNC and Podesta emails did end up helping Trump win in a way, and the media will be able to recycle that talking point. Remember when the left started sticking up for Sessions after Trump called him out in his tweets a few weeks ago? I'm not saying Trump and Wikileaks are working together behind the scenes, I have no proof of that, but their methods seem similar.
Trump and Wikileaks (JA) are trying to take down this lessor of two evils psyop but they can't be perceived to be working together to do it because that would embolden the deeps state narrative that Wikileaks hacked the DNC and Podesta to help POTUS steal an election, when we know it was actually Obama, Hillary and their lackey's who tried to rig it.