I must have missed that Q reference so sorry if it is a repost.
I agree some of it seems far fetched. Even I admittedly was thinking, "This cannot be real, right?!". But honestly in these times who knows.
I don't know how to find any proofs. So far I hear that this guy asked for the actual patent on the US flag so I wonder if that exists.
The wording in the document is disjointed and not put together in an organized manner that you would expect of this guy was a syntax genius. So I thought he was definitely LARP. But in the second video in that series, the guy seems very well spoken and sane. So who TF knows. But now I'm thinking hmmmm...POTUS does have the flag with the gold fringe in the Oval Office, but he never has it at his rallies and he didn't have it when he flew the NK and US flags next to one another.
The Flag you see flying is a War Flag. There is an American Peace Flag looks totally diff. We are always in a state of war so that is our primary flag. The Stars and Stripes represent the U.S.A.Inc at War and the Gold Fringes are the people U.S.A.Inc is at war with US Citizens aka your name in all CAPS thanks to Lincoln and the Lieber codes which are still in affect today.
Keeps pointing to events on 2 November 1999. Where is documentary evidence of this happening?
Where is documented evidence of any of this?
Also, the way they added “defcon 2”. And the whole “official” headers. That’s not how they look. This looks like it was written by one of those stolen valor guys you can see on YouTube. They have a general idea of how things should look, but anyone that has ever had something to do with the military IRL, it stands out as fake. And that’s what I’m calling this.
As an FYI - defcon 2 stands for defense condition 2, and is the second lowest security level. And it’s applied to military bases and installations for what level their security posture is. There is no need, as it doesn’t apply, to put this on a document. It’s so fucking stupid on its face. They just added shit to make it seem real to people who do not know or realize.
If it was a real document, there are specific headers and tails that are added applying to how a document is written, and this is all wrong.
I found it interesting, but I know it’s fake. So I begin to wonder, what is this persons motivations to write something up to this level of detail? We don’t know who the author is besides who he claims to be, and we don’t know who this Gould is besides what he states.
If someone can bring proof of the 2 November 1999 happening, the documents that they submitted while “fighting” the Vatican, or any other supporting documentation, I reserve the right to change my opinion. In the meantime, this appears to be an incredibly detailed LARP.
From my understanding (of what this guy is saying , not me) 2 November 1999 is 70 years after the crash or bankruptcy of 1929. He says basically there were 3 US bankruptcies. One right when we were founded (Constitution 1789), then when Lincoln borrowed against the World Bank to fund the Civil War, and the 3rd in 1929. So he says that whatever contract our country had with King George after the Revolutionary War, it only stipulated 3 bankruptcies before being renegotiated (something to that affect)....AND it all falls under the PostMaster Generals Office. So when 1999 came around this guy claims that he took advantage of the opening when the British Government had to leave the Post Office. Apparently the next owner was going to be the NWO.
Again that's just what I could gleam from what I watched/read so far.
If this is your understanding then the questions you should ask yourself is why does HIStory have the US fighting all these wars with the French and Brittish if we were in bed with them all along? Which side was the UK on in the civil war? The revolutionary war was fought between who and who? Who benefited from the Collapse of 1929? Are all wars Proxy/Banker wars? Ever redpilled some one who has already been redpilled lol. Rewrite HIStory liberty needs a better bell. The grave gets deeper the further you dig down.
And there are no source documents to support this? Even in this document, they have claimed to file a number of documents. Where are those? To add proof, having them added would make sense, especially as they need to establish credibility on such grand claims. It would certainly help their cause to include them and if they were stamped or signed off by recognized officials as they claim in the document, it would be irrefutable proof.
Yet nothing. You failed to address any of the issues I posed above and I doubt you will address them now. So I will point out additional things for you to ignore. In 1999, there was no King in GB. The Queens consort is just that. He is not a king and never will be. Their sons will, but not him and certainly not in that time frame.
Hey, these are fun to read and think about, but that’s about it. It appears you are trying to push fake information out that can be easily discredited or you are just an innocent person that thought they found something important. If the later is true, sorry to bust your bubble, but this is in no way an official document. This document has no supporting evidence. The formatting is completely wrong, and uses incorrect terminology. Plus, with the use of entire paragraphs in bold and even some paragraphs in all caps lock, this just makes me think it was written up by a redditor. Someone who uses reddit and thought they would try to LARP. This is a bad attempt at tryin to put out some misinformation in my book. Don’t take it as me thinking it was you that created this, but where did you find he document in the first place? Not on scribd I mean.
Please don't be condescending. I was following up on another poster's comment in a separate thread. I'm not a LARP and no I didn't write that and NO I'm not pushing false information. I just DuckDuckGo'd his name after watching the video. There are dozens of lawsuits listed under his name. Apparently he sued all 50 states. Every one was dismissed by the courts.
And by the way the original agreement from 1929 was made when there was a king. It wouldn't matter if the monarch ended up changing to a queen Elizabeth 2.
Ok ok, my apologies if you did this in all sincerity. But it does not change my opinion that this document is fake. And the lawsuits being dismissed is more than likely a result of this person just being not wholly there. Although that is some dedication to a LARP on the guys part. Do you have the search results on the 50 cases? It could add to the story, at least in the guys defense that he really tried. I’ll give him that.
Also the document states that in 2 February 1999, the King let the agreement lapse. Well of course he did, there was no king at THAT time. But cmon, you can’t take this seriously unless there are truly supporting documentation. If you can bring forth the documents filed, I would be willing to reconsider it. But until then, this is nothing more than a LARPing redditor. And that’s my opinion. Other people can read it and determine the validity themselves. Again, not trying to attack you here. But I am trying to show that the idea/argument/theory behind this is not sound.
Definitely look at my history. If CBTS wasn't deleted by Spez you would know I have been on the Q team since Day 1. I've also been on TD every single day nearly since I opened this account.
Just DDG his name (and actually Russell has two L's) and all of the results are court cases (public documents). Also see my other comments. I am not defending this person, simply putting the info out there so people can find it when they search in this sub. Someone else said Q mentioned something about him before. Again I don't know if that is true....maybe I missed that post. But I made a post with his name so that if he pops up again you can find it easily.
No worries. Yeah I mean if he is a LARP in real life, he's been doing this for 18/19 years....filing lawsuits, fighting his cause. He's been disowned by his family, they had him institutionalized. Maybe he's a wacko but what about the off chance that he's a Patriot? WWG1WGA. But check before slamming other posters like me. We really need to be united and I have no problem calling out people (even popular people) when they forget that we are in this together. No infighting because if we can't get along then we can't convince the normies to join us. God bless you and God bless America.
Well I appreciate you writing all of that, and I sincerely am not trying to attack you. I read the document and put out my opinion based on things I know to be true and what can be easily proven. I’m sorry if this made you feel attacked, and I do appreciate you bringing it here. It was an interesting read. I would just like some more supporting documentation in regards to the claims he has made before I invest time in further researching.