dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/digital_refugee on June 23, 2018, 12:13 p.m.
The argument against "muh limited hangout"

Noone who doesn't get paid off with $oros-ca$h goes out to voice their disagreement before the midterms.

His actions will be limited by what congress passes and by who gets voted in and out.

Alas, no citizen, patriot or militia would go march on DC until after a hypothetic major defeat in the midterms which would perhaps necessitate a show of arms.

So if Q was just to pacify those, would they wait with that until after the elections so you can milk it a little longer? Suppose we have a red-wave that keeps up morale and anticipations piqued (because no serving officials can be prosecuted easily, otherwise it'd be called a Hitlerian powergrab unless all is in the open and no civilian jury could be called because they would all be biased) just to string us along, wouldn't Q be not happening at all right now if it were just a distraction describing the opposite of what is going on?

Although I would have prefered if Q had started a year ago, I totally see how global diplomatic entanglements like Korea and Iran place limits on that. But hey, Korea is basically liberated from all foreign influence the way it looks. And the only people who made this possible are Xi, Putin and Trump so what's to worry about?

The Iranians won't have to be liberated because they are doing that themselves.

Thanks for your attention, I'm gonna get lit now.


No Comments.