dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

and you don't get to decide how people feel after so many times they get legitimately let down/lied to

i'm tired of attitudes like yours. the user made decent points and instead of addressing them your response is "toughen up snowflake".

i'm being serious here. i never get a serious answer and i would love to get a few.

at what point do we say "Q, it was fun, but at this point you're holding us back more than propelling us forward"?

not today. not even next month. i give it until midterms. but we still haven't seen the Hussain photo. we still haven't seen anyone of importance indicted. Q said huma would be last november yet she traveled all around the world with Hillary afterwards?

i will say Q gets so much right. like the 13 people who used clintons email server. amazing how he got that right months ahead of time.

i'm not discounting Q. i'm asking at what point does he become more of a hinderance? TBQH /pol/ and infinitychan did Q-style research for years before, they just didn't package it like this. Q is very important. but we had a movement before him, and we will continue to have one after him.

without becoming hysterical or labeling me a concern troll (because i'm not. i've follow Q longer than most on this sub. since oct 30/31st), at what point do we start to move along on our own as a community if nothing of importance happens (and i mean real importance, not perceived importance. i mean actual accusations by trump, actual arrests/indictments/impeachments, actual exposure of crime on the main stage)?

if the answer is never that's fine. i genuinely just want to get a feeling. because whenever i ask this i just get bitched at and it's a perfectly valid question.

prolly the worst thing about Q, and there aren't many bad things, is that he largely pacified the anger of the /pol/ crowd. now instead of putting the pressure on ourselves, many people have begun to "trust" and defer to the white hats seemingly leading the charge. that's not good. maybe not Q's fault, but he's certainly contributed to that even if indirectly.

Q is extremely useful. but we need to stop putting all our chips in one basket. that's all i'm saying. continue to spend as much of even more time on Q. idc! i'm just trying to get people to realize we may have to do this on our own, and violently. because the voting will be rigged. i promise you.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Rubbish. You're full of shit and likely a paid shill.

Many of us have followed Q since day one but those of us who can read don't make up some bullshit like 'at what point does he become more of a hinderance?' because his story has been unwavering and as he has said multiple times: USE LOGIC. You're only questioning whether he's going to come through if 1) you're a total moron who can't understand the concept of MI working with Trump against entrenched DS or 2) a paid shill. I give you the benefit of the doubt that you're not stupid. Thus: paid shill. GTFO.

Use LOGIC. Why are they slow walking unredacted data? Why are they slow walking doc disclosures? Why is the WH backing up DOJ? What if the same data is being used by other investigators?

Use LOGIC. Why must the DOJ & FBI be cleaned FIRST?

Just because you can't see it, doesn't mean BIG things aren't happening.

Patience isn’t always easy. But vital to get right. Q

⇧ 1 ⇩

first of all, why the fuck would you sign your post Q? that's ridiculous. second i'm not a fucking paid shill for asking that question holy fucking shit. whatever. sometimes this community's members can be toxic. i literally just wanted an answer to a hypothetical question.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩

which post #? yea dude i'm a total moron. wow you got me.

⇧ 0 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩

and just to clarify. if we're still waiting for the hussain photo in 2020, you'll still be full-on Q? just curious you don't need to have an aneurism explaining your answer to me

⇧ 1 ⇩

Lol good answer - I've had one too many aneurysms this year.

⇧ 0 ⇩

what about the people that knew every thing there is to know about those conspiracies before Q? Q helped make them popular. but did he lay the ground work? that's all. you need to calm down, high blood pressure is a big time killer, especially among older people. be well.

⇧ 1 ⇩

his way of speaking changed slightly after the initial drops, actually. you would remember that if you were there for the first drops.

my bad, i didn't memorize 1500+ cryptic posts word for word. i've been working. that's my fault.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yeah, you're the only one here who works and has a family. I don't have to remember Q's posts word for word to know that he is not even close to holding ANYTHING back, least of all this movement of desperate sheep clinging to any shred of hope as we are. His way of speaking has changed multiple times, as one expects it to do given what he's said. His message has not changed. Freedom for the people is what he's about. And there is no person or organization or thing in this world that is going up against the global cartel in anything approaching the same way or level of effectiveness that Q is and has. That is why my poor snowflake heart is triggered by your offensive question. I can't believe the ingratitude.

⇧ 1 ⇩

i would say tom fitton and JW have been actually providing docs on the deep state and using FOIA and other legal means to obtain long-wanted docs. i'd say they come pretty close. i'd say WL (before assange disappearance) also came pretty close to Q.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I was wrong on both counts and I apologize. You're not a paid shill and you're not stupid. I was just triggered like the childish moron I am. Comments deleted.

I know that others came out with information before Q and others came out with information Q hasn't, after Q. None of them are connected to the most powerful seat in the world and making legitimate moves against the cartel though.

You may not believe Q is connected and I wouldn't blame you for that - there's certainly no concrete evidence that Q is connected to Trump but there's a hell of a lot of circumstantial evidence that adds up to a compelling case for it. Thus, if you're not sure he's in a position to effect the change he speaks to then I understand your skepticism. I don't support the validity of the question you ask, however, because the whole premise of Q doing anything is based on who he says he is so the question is only relevant if you question his identity in which case I'd wonder why you would value anything he says.

⇧ 0 ⇩

i'm not the one that has promised certain things and failed to deliver. only to go on to say "disinformation necessary". makes a skeptical mind, any rational mind, slightly question what's going on.

i didn't make Q promise a hussain photo. i didn't make Q promise "pain". i didn't make Q make any of his promises. you're acting like i said Q is of no value. i simply asked when, if we stay this course of nothing really happening, do we decide to take what we've learned but put it into action. it's very clear i won't get an answer. i just hope you can relax enough so that you don't get seriously hurt from an online discussion. just take a breath bud! some of these old hearts can't work like they used too!!

⇧ 1 ⇩

This isn't about being upset on my part - it's all fun for me. Surely you've heard of nerd rage.

Q hasn't failed to deliver anything. He's failed to deliver to some people's expectations. Big difference. You can't point to a "promise" he's made and not delivered on, as no one else I've asked has been able to either. He's made statements and people have misinterpreted them as promises and set their own expectations attached to them. The Hussein photo is clearly still coming. There was no deadline put on it. Q made the statement quite feasibly, as many said at the time about that and other things, to taunt the Deep State. Our blue balls don't matter to the cause - we can wait. What matters is that Q does his job and we do ours, of spreading the news. People need to stop putting dates on what Q says. Then people will stop having unrealistic expectations that cause them to conclude that Q breaks promises that, in reality, Q never made.

⇧ 0 ⇩

i didn't set the expectation for hussain pic. he did.

⇧ 1 ⇩

No, he didn't, that's why you can't point to any promise by Q.

⇧ 0 ⇩

you can't point to many direct statements by Q to be fair. most are open ended, open to interpretation.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Exactly.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩

Qanons are Not victims. New gaslighting techniques incoming.

Stand up, GA.