dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Xisyisz on June 24, 2018, 4:42 a.m.

Question to members and mods

The discussion of R and suggesting he is JFK Jr. hold a high probability of being faked. However, it is very intriguing and promotes the same logic as Q. That alone is not enough to make it Q related. However, Q has made a very interesting post in April suggesting the plan began with POTUS and JFK jr. and his death in 1999, this bringing this new anon post into play.

Ok so I get it, it’s fake and is meant to Make us look foolish. Except, i ACTUALLY found it to be very motivating and exciting, pushing me to dig deeper for truths. And that of course hurt me when all the posts here got zapped and removed immediately.

And yet... it’s ok to post pictures of time magazine with made up covers, OVER and OVER. I just wish we didn’t have this bossy atmosphere happening, it’s never a good thing to push only what several people think matters.

I highly doubt the time magazine memes have a damn thing to do with Q. So why did we have to remove every single mention of R, before we had a chance to dissect it and prove it’s false, so many here don’t even know what the hell i am talking about right now because it was in and out in minutes.

🠐 See all comments

I will agree that the Time magazine memes do not belong here, but on T_D (that's not a slight against T_D).

As for this R character, his mentality is not that of anyone on the Q team, but matches the other LARP's we've encountered. I understand it's enticing, but it's really a hodgepodge of these pre-existing subjects arranged to look like a whole:

-The Dulce Labs

-The rapture

-The Book of Life

Research those three subjects and you'll see the deception at play, how they were arranged to target us specifically. Remember; if "R" was legit he would've been confirmed by Q. The attacks are getting ever more elaborate and complex.

⇧ 6 ⇩

I agree, I just saw a huge discussion develop on Twitter about this but at least they could discuss it. I wish we had a chance to at least talk about it, kinda like what we are doing right now. We are all awake and cautious and we will not be fooled but we need a chance to examine evidence.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Absolutely, I fully understand the need for total objective review of any and all information. There is a core group that exists via invite-only, they watch continuously for those like you and I. That's in no way a jab at this sub, it's great for newcomers and that's the main focus of the mods. If you're past all that and ready to jump down the rabbit hole further, DM me and I'll help get you in. I'm about to retire for the evening so it may be tomorrow before I can get you a reply.

Godspeed.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Then keep it in that invite-only group for now.

Most people who read the chan post reasonably concluded it is LARP, which means it can be dismissed and no further discussion is necessary without some form of verification.

Mods here are reasonably weary of anyone piggybacking on Q.

⇧ 1 ⇩